Help please!

@ Girishankar,

Mind your language before posting reply to this forum. Learned people, law students are also here along with laymen. I feel pity for the way you analyse relationships. Atleast, let there be respect for the other gender. Let alone law, you do not seem to be a cultured individual. There is freedom to express your views, but that doesnt mean you can say whatever you wish to.

Dear Mr Venkatesh

Pl note i didnt use that word as U said it was  QUERY  of, Mr. Fed Up..........It was Just a Layman reply...

Very Sorry If I hav Hurted U students are the future nation.........

Suchitra. S Ji Very very very Sorry ....

Dear Students any one there give Voice for Males if so pl do any thing for them.....

Girishankar ji,  to err is human. I appreciate your gesture.

Dear Suchithra Ji

Thank U for making me a Cultured individual......By making me feeling Sorry.........

Ok suchitra i dint really have to do anything since u already solved the issue...Good goin Gurl!...No matter what u proved ur point right...

Rules of service for persons visiting/contributing to this site.

7. Rules Relating Services

If you use the services , you are solely responsible for communications posted by you or through your Account. You agree that violation of any of the following rules constitutes a material breach of this Agreement:

Using theService for any purpose in violation of local, state, national, or international laws;

• Providing false information on your registration form or impersonating any person;
• Posting material that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others or on the privacy or publicity rights of others;
• Posting or transmitting any information, data, text, files, links, software, chat, communication, or any other materials that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, invasive of another's privacy, harassing, defamatory, slanderous, vulgar, obscene, hateful, racist, embarrassing or otherwise objectionable to any other person or entity as determined by Lawyersclubindia.comin its sole discretion;
• Posting or transmitting any unsanctioned advertising, promotional materials, or any other forms of unsanctioned solicitation, including, without limitation, "junk mail," "Spam," "chain letters," or any unsolicited mass distribution of email;
• Posting surveys, contests, or pyramid schemes;
• Posting improper questions or answers that are not related to the particular topic;
• Stalking, harassing, or otherwise harming others;
• Distributing viruses, corrupted files, or any other similar software or programs that may damage the operation of another’s computer;
• Collecting or storing personal data about other users of the Site; Inducing, enticing, soliciting, recruiting, luring, or attempting to induce, entice, solicit, recruit, or lure users or Experts to another web site which, inLawyersclubindia.com reasonable determination, is a competitor of Lawyersclubindia.com
• Engaging in any other conduct that inhibits any other person from using or enjoying the Q&A Service or the Site;
• Engaging in any other behavior on the Site, which in Lawyersclubindia.com sole discretion is unacceptable.
• Lawyersclubindia.commay (but is not obligated) to remove Content for any reason, with or without notice to you, including without limitation Submissions (as defined below) that do not conform with the rulesService and terminate your access to the Site.
   

My dear Mr. Venkatesh S., This has got the reference of your reply above of 18th Feb. at 7.23 A.M. I really appreciate the way you answered and the way you are looking at the things. Most unfortunate, some people, only with bitter personal experience try to generalize the entire women class as vamps and while they are spewing venom, they forget that the splashes are falling on the faces of their own mothers and sisters.

The faulty argument in respect of Section 498-A is that only 2 to 3% conviction rate is there and hence, all the cases are false.  These people have such a myopic outlook.  I want to ask them that how many Section 302, 308, 420, 461 and 478 I.P.C. cases are turned to convictions?  What about TADA conviction (only about 6 to 7%).  Now, can these people argue that there are no murders, no attempt to murders, no rapes, no cheating,  no forgery as there are a few or no convictions.

Now, violence against women is concerned, the most heinous crime is rape under Section 376.  The conviction rate is mere 20%.  Whether the champions of men say that no rape was held and the alleged rape victim was trying to harass the accused "to extort money".  Let me briefly explain why rape accused are not being convicted.  Most of the rape accused are near relatives of the victims (some times even brothers or father).  Hence a rape victim is forced to become a hostile witness in the court proceedings by persuasion of her own blood relation and she is a material witness and hence case will go in favour of accused.  The prosecution will not protect the rape victim and enjoy the scene, when rape victim is gruelled by the defence advocate in the open court in humiliating circumstances.  Even, in the police station, at the time of lodging the FIR, the rape victim and her mother face so humiliating and hostile atmosphere.  In addition to this, faulty investigating method adopted by the I.O. , i.e., not collecting the dress material wore by the victim and accused at the time of incident, not collecting the material objects at the site, which prove s*xual act, not taking the victim in proper time as a result of which v**ginal squabs are not being taken properly, costly DNA tests and prosecution's non-insistence for taking DNA tests etc.,tampering the evidence and accosting the prosecution witnesses as in most of the cases they are relatives and offering the parents of s*x victim with money etc.  These are only illustrations but not exhaustive explanations.  As these many handicaps are there, the rape accused go scot free.

Another most inhuman thing is killing the gir child in womb.  Everyone accepts that this is happening on the basis of population statistics, but not even a single prosecution was held against such perpetrators.  Can the champions of "so called men's race" give any explanation.  

If there is abuse of Sectin 498-A, bring them into light but not brand every case under Sectin 498-A is a false one and do not shout that Indian is unknown of "harassing the women", "giving and taking dowry" and "dowry deaths". 

Dear Prabhakar,

That was a huge amount of useful technical and statistical information, with Sections.  I just copied your text and keep that for future reference.

I wish all learned members answer queries this way, so that we can learn from them.

Cheers!