Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

NATARAJAN IYER (Proprietor)     30 November 2014

Advocate Goes to Jail But Refuses to come to the Police Sta

One common complaint heard today is that the Advocate visits the jail but refuses to come to the

 

Police Station.

 

Around a few months ago, when I was in a discussion with a junior of a state designated senior counsel,

 

I raised the same topic.

 

He narrated an instance when one of the clients of the state designated senior counsel wanted him to


accompany him to the police station.


The senior advocate refused.

 

The client said “ Do not forget that I have paid you twenty thousand rupees as advance, in this matter.


You are ethically bound to come to the police station and right now ”.

 

So the senior advocate replied “ I will throw the money you have given, right on your face.


Come and collect it straight-away, right now.


Advocate has no job in the police station. Let the matter reach the court.


The advocate will take it up there at the court “.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________


So, I raised the same topic to another senior advocate, retired and now in his late 70s.

 

He said “ Yes, as a matter of fact, it is indeed true that the advocate has no job in the police station ".

 

The police are trained in the basics of law and they can categorize the offence and file a case.


The advocate should not even attempt to influence the police to file this case and not that case.

 

The police cannot be prevented from doing their job.

 

Right or wrong, that can be contested later in court.

 

When it comes to the court, based on the merits or de-merits of the case, the advocate would


handle the case legally and either get the same quashed or proceed to ensure appropriate


legal treatment.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

Then one day, I was having a discussion with a retired police officer, at the airport.


He was telling me about the duty of a police patrol team to constantly patrol the area,

 

24 hours and ensure that no unlawful assembly is seen and this way the public too thinks

 

twice before committing a crime since the police might always be around.

 

He then lamented the condition today, of the police force.

 

I raised this topic then of the advocates refusing to visiting the police station, especially

 

during matrimonial dispute related arrests . He started laughing.

 

I asked him why he is laughing it off.

 

He told me “ It is good that the advocate does not visit today’s police stations ".  

 

I will tell you the reason.

 

Practically, on field, what happens is that the moment a complaint is filed in the police station


and the police summon the accused, the corrupt type of police officers, keep thinking of ways and

 

methods to open the topic of the rate card for bribe. 

 

Each offence has a rate card as bribe.

 

But they cannot openly seek bribe.

 

The moment they see a black-coat ( advocate ), the corrupt ones among the police become extremely pleased and happy.


This is because they now have an intermediary agent who understands their language and to


whom they can convey the rate card to the accused.

 

Since the police constable too treats the

 

post-graduate and

 

senior advocate as a broker / agent,


the advocates avoid police stations.

 

Technically too, the advocate is right in telling that “ An Advocate has no job at the Police Station “.

 

 

Then  I asked him how is it that the advocates visit the jail.

 

He replied and gave these facts.

 

“ Those advocates are usually fresh pass-outs or juniors or independent free-lancers ".

 

The moment a person is arrested and taken to jail, the lower-rung police send an sms to

 

some advocates on their network.

 

This advocate will  just file the vakalathnama and take care of the bail for the accused.

 

The accused pays the advocate and the advocate pays a commission to the police man.

 

In fact, till recently upto a  few years ago, after LLB, the advocates would start searching for


recommendations and references to join a reputed law firm. They would not step into police stations.


But now, in recent years, immediately after their LLB, some advocates who decide to make


quick money by criminal law practice, first get in touch with the police stations and


build their professional network there.

 

Evenings, usually, these advocates can also be seen near the jails, enquiring if any accused / prisoner


needs an advocate.

 

But the professional advocates would however deal through the court of law and avoid even speaking to us.

 

These professional advocates say they will speak to

us through the law and the courts.

 

So you have the reasons for advocates visiting jails but not the police stations.



Learning

 2 Replies

anilcochin (Proprietor)     30 November 2014

Dear all,

I would like to explain my situation at the police station.

My wife filed 498a. I applied for AB from High Court. My Wife's side tried putting section 379 but the same was deleted by the Magistrate (due to the latest supreme court guidelines magistrates are more careful in 498a cases). 

I got AB. I requested my Family court lawyer to come to the PS but he cited his non-availability.

I requested my DV & 498a representing lawyer & he agreed to come to the police station.

My AB stated stat I have to present myself on every Second Saturday of each month between 10 am & 11 am at the police station & in case of arrest 2 sureties were required.

Wen we reached there on the specified time & day the IO was on leave that day. He spoke to me on the phone & said that "why don't u come on monday?". I told him that I had come along with 2 sureties & my lawyer & this was the day specified as per the order. He said since he was not there it was a problem. 

 I did not know how to respond to this request from the SI, as on monday I would have breached the date set by High Court in my AB. My lawyer said that the process can be done in IO absence by the other SI at the PS. I conveyed the message to him & he reluctantly agreed & informed his junior to do the process.

The ASI wrote the case details and my name & the name of sureties on a Plain A4 sheet & asked me & the 2 sureties to sign on the paper & behaved as if the process was complete.

At this moment my Lawyer stepped in and asked the relevent questions, which myself & the 2 sureties who were visiting the PS for such a process had no clue about.

1. A Challan type form needs to be filled in & signed by accused & 2 sureties.

2. A diary entry has to be made where the accused has to sign in on his monthly visit.

Had it not been for my lawyer,  I would be in default of AB Bail conditions. From Monday IO would have delayed it further & then coveniently apply for cancellation of bail for default of appearance at PS. 

In my personal opinion, lawyers presence makes a lot of difference & puts you at ease & knowledgeable about the process to be followed at the PS. One visit by the lawyer gives you enough confidence to approach the PS monthly.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     03 December 2014

Mr. Iyer is right in opining that lawyer's presence in police station is not at all required and generally the senior lawyers do not visit the police stations or even jails until and unless the situation really warrants.   A situation like what was experienced by Mr. Anil cochin may be an exemption.  However a client cannot demand his lawyer to accompany him to the police station or to the registrar's office.   A lawyer if accepting to handle his client's case, he can confine himself to the court case alone and not for an outside affair, it will be unethical too.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading