Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Rupali Ramteke   18 April 2020

Execution of decree under r.2 order xxi

A purchased property from B. The sale, however was fictitious. A paid Rs. 5000 to save the said property from being sold in execution of decree obtained by C against B. A then filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 5000 against B. How will you decide? Give reason. Will B be liable to compensate A as a surety? Or in what capacity will the decision be given?


 4 Replies

Parveen Bhatia   18 April 2020

mam if b allows to c sales rights than a can go for suit against b. mam may I know that you are which city or state.

Parveen Bhatia   18 April 2020

mam may I get any corresponding details.

Dr J C Vashista (Lawyer)     18 April 2020

Details of facts posted are incomplete and vague, which can not lead to form an opinion and oblige.

What is the suit property ?

How did you draw the inference that sale transaction is fictitious ?

What is the corelation between A and C, ?

Whether the amount of Rs. 5,000/- is consideration or part thereof ? 

P. Venu (Advocate)     18 April 2020

What is A, B, C, ............? Is there any real issue?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query