Master the Science Behind Firearm Evidence. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Capt RK Sharma (Lecturer)     23 March 2026

End of life vehicle(7days late) impounded by mcd housegate, and later echallan issued by vaahan

MY CAR RC EXPIRED 10 MARCH 2025, I APPLIED FOR VOLUNTARY SCRAP ON VAAHAN WEBSITE ON 11 MARCH 2025. NEGOTIATION WITH APPROVED SCRAPPER IN PROGRESS VIA EMAIL. AROUND 17TH 1300 HOURS CAR FORCIBLY PICKED UP FROM OUTSIDE THE THE GATE OF MY HOUSE BY MCD FOR SCRAP. GIVEN TO THEIR OWN SCRAPPER FOR SCRAP. WHO PAID VERY LITTLE FOR OLD CAR.(ABT 17K WHREAS MY APPROVED SCRAPPER WANTED TO PAY 31K).

LOST BENEFIT OF VOLUNTARY SCRAPPING SCHEME.

I RAISED A COMPLAINT ON CP GRAM PORTAL. MCD TOOK 6 MONTHS TO RESOLVE WITH NO RELIEF TO ME. COULD NOT APPEAL ONLINE ON THAT.

TO MY SURPRISE I FOUND AFTER ABOUT 5 MONTHS THAT TRANSPORT DEPT HAS ALSO ISSUED ECHALLAN ON SAME DAY 17 MARCH 2025 @ 1528 HOURS FOR NO PUC CERT at sarai kalekhan location. Whereas at that time my car was in possession of MCD.

Raised another grievance on Vaahan plateform, again it was resolved with no relief to me and challan is for Rs. 10000/-. 

Any suggestion i have full video recorded in my house CCTV when MCD picked up my car from my house gate.



 2 Replies

Rama chary Rachakonda (Secunderabad/Telangana state Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294 )     24 March 2026

Your situation involves an unauthorized impoundment by MCD despite your ongoing voluntary scrapping process, followed by an invalid eChallan issued while the vehicle was in MCD custody.

With CCTV evidence, you have strong grounds to challenge both via appeals and courts. Here's how to proceed step-by-step. Appeal CPGRAMS Grievance Rate the MCD CPGRAMS resolution as 'Poor' to enable the appeal option directly on the portal using your original grievance ID. CPGRAMS allows appeals if unsatisfied, trackable via the same registration number.

 Escalate to higher MCD authorities or Directorate of Public Grievances (DPG) under Cabinet Secretariat if unresolved. Challenge eChallan File a fresh grievance on the Parivahan eChallan portal (echallan.parivahan.gov.in/gsticket/) explaining the vehicle was impounded by MCD at 1300 hrs on 17 March 2025 (before the 1528 hrs violation at Sarai Kalekhan), attaching CCTV video, impound details, and voluntary scrap application proof. Submit within deadlines (typically 60 days, but re-appeal if prior was rejected), then email helpdesk-echallan@gov.in or visit Delhi RTO for escalation.

 Evidence shows impounded vehicles shouldn't receive post-seizure challans.Escalate to Courts If portals fail, file a writ petition in Delhi High Court under Article 226 against MCD (for illegal pickup/loss of scrapping benefits) and Transport Dept (for wrongful Rs.10,000 challan). Similar cases challenge MCD impounds from private property/gates as unlawful, especially with prior scrap application and CCTV proof of forcible towing without notice.

 Seek quashing of challan, compensation for Rs.14K loss (31K-17K), and costs; consult a local lawyer via platforms like LawyersClubIndia where your post exists.

 Gather and Submit Evidence CCTV video timestamped 17 March 1300 hrs showing MCD pickup from house gate. Vahan voluntary scrap application dated 11 March 2025. Emails with approved scrapper (Rs.31K offer). CPGRAMS and prior Vahan grievance details. Upload all (under 2MB each) in appeals; RTI MCD/Transport for impound/challan records if needed.

 Act quickly as delays weaken cases.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     26 March 2026

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) cannot arbitrarily seize a private vehicle from outside your house gate unless it was declared abandoned, due notice is given and proper seizure procedure is followed.  In your case the RC expired on 10 March 2025, you applied for voluntary scrapping on VAHAN portal on 11 March 2025 and the vehicle lifted on 17 March without completing your process.  This is a clear case of violation of your right to  dispose vehicle via voluntary scrapping, lapse of procedure or abuse of power and creating a loss of ₹14,000. 

The challan issued by transport department on 17.3.26 for PUC especially when the vehicle was under the possession of MCD is a clear factual contradiction, i.e., either wrong tagging  or  system misuse / incorrect entry. This challan is legally challengeable and likely to be quashed.

The CPGRAMS closure cannort stop you from taking legal action.

You may File case in the Traffic Court / Lok Adalat / Virtual Court (Delhi), by attaching the copies of CCTV footage (time stamped), scrapping application proof (11 March) and the MCD seizure proof (if any / photos / witnesses). You can argue that the “Vehicle was not in my possession at time of alleged offence”. This challan should almost certainly be cancelled.

Alternately you can send a legla notice thorugh an advocate to The Municipal Corporation of Delhi, claim Illegal lifting, financial loss (₹14,000 difference) and mental harassment, and demand Compensation, explanation under which law vehicle was seized, etc. 

If there is no responsen then you can approach consumer grievances redressal commission wiht a complaint for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by public authority and claim Scrap value difference along with compensation (mental harassment + delay). Youj can even file a writ petition before high court under Article 226 on the grounds of Arbitrary state action, Violation of natural justice and Illegal deprivation of property and pray for Compensation, Quashing of challan and action against officials.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register