LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Guest (Guest)     06 May 2010

Direct Taxes Code likely to retain EEE

The proposed Direct Taxes Code (DTC) is likely to retain the exempt-exempt-exempt (EEE) regime for taxation of individual savings. The Finance Ministry, which is giving final touches to the revised DTC draft, reckons that a shift to the exempt-exempt-tax (EET) regime, as proposed in the original draft of the code, may not pass muster. In the current EEE regime, savings are exempt from tax in all the three stages: contribution, accretion and withdrawal. The EET method, which is considered to be the best global practice for taxation of savings, allows exemption at the first two stages, but provides for a tax on withdrawals at the personal marginal rate. Government sources said that the via-media option of exempting withdrawals up to a certain threshold and taxing higher amounts could make things complex and invite charges of discrimination. “We would be left with no option but to retain the present regime where the savings are exempt from tax at all three stages,” a senior Finance Ministry official told FE. The Finance Ministry is reportedly planning to set up a committee to suggest ways to link interest on small savings instruments, like public provident fund schemes, with market rates. The idea is that the administered interest rate for small savings— which is a tad above the fixed term deposits of banks—causes distortions. Analysts feel it would be premature to suggest a change in the method of taxation of savings at this juncture, as accretion to savings is linked to interest rates. Another factor that weighs on the mind of policymakers is that since the intended purpose of the DTC is to make tax laws simpler, making a distinction between low and high savings could go against its very purpose.  “The concept of EET is primarily prominent in developed countries which have comprehensive social security schemes. In India, in the absence of. such schemes, small tax saving instruments for individuals like retirement kitty should not be taxed. The EET regime requires reconsideration,” said Vikas Vasal, Executive Director, KPMG.



 1 Replies

Vineet (Director)     07 May 2010

Dear Mr Shah

 

Would you please enlighten on the source of this information. If it has been taken from those regular press reports, request you to place them in news section.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register