Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Amo (non)     04 September 2012

Crpc 97 dismissed by jmfc against sil and in-laws

 

Dear All,
This is to inform you all that my FIL filed a case in JMFC u/s 97 to issue search warrant of his daughter who is legally wedded Wife of mine.
The allegations were very vague like dowry harassment, ill treatment, Husband of his daughter having extra marital affairs, et etc etc....and above all the respondents which include me as well as my parents. According to the allegation of my FIL, his daughter was confined by us so he filed a petition in JMFC Court.
The same got dismissed on same day of filling. Below is the Order passed while dismissing the petition.

Order:-
"Read this application and affidavit filed in its support. Pursued the documents filed on records. heard learn counsel Shri Rajguru for the Applicant. Upon Hearing this court finds that the allegations are against the Son-in-Law and the Mother-in-Law & the father-in-law. The allegations seems to be that the daughter of Applicant is confined by the Non-Applicants.
However upon hearing I find that the daughter of the applicant is the Wife of NA No-1, and NA No-2 & 3 are the parents of NA No-1.
From the allegations in this application this court does not find any reason to believe that the Daughter of the Applicant is confined. She is legally wedded wife of the NA No-1. Therefore her stay with NA does not amount to confinement. Wife of NA No-1 is Highly Educated. Therefore there is no Reason. Hence application stands dismissed."

Now my queries are.....
1) How strong this could be to deny the maintenance u/s125 which is at the stage of Defense Evidence??
2) What counter cases I could file on my FIL??? I just wanna screw his happiness....
3) How effective this could be in Divorce Case?????
4) How effective this could be in RCR Case??????

Looking forward for your support to define strategy for screwing FIL......

Rgs,
Gladiator498a



Learning

 1 Replies

Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA)     05 September 2012

This order has nothing to do with other cases you mentioned.

 

better fight them all on respective merits.

 

 


Regards,
 
Shonee Kapoor

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Start a New Discussion Unreplied Threads


Popular Discussion


view more »




Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query