Negotiable Instruments: Exhaustive Coverage by Adv Roma Bhagat. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Being Human (LLB)     28 June 2015

Crminal proceeding help!!!

What are stages in crpc where evidence can be submitted to court, during

1. chief examination. 2. cross examination. 3. or at any stages

How can an applicant of case can know what are evidence is consider by the court.

What is the procedure where witness can correct is wrong answer given to leading question asked by the defended lawyer.

What is the procedure of guiding the public prosecutor. can pp cross examine and asked leading question to the accused. if yes at what stages.

Can any person be forced to appear in the court, if he is involved in the subject matter of dispute and not in crime e.g. one who support the accused. if yes what is the procedure and at what stage of criminal proceeding it can be or can not de done.

If complainant said i dont know intention or i forget the intention of the accused in the audio recording, does it has any evidence value. if yes what is the procedure to submit the same in court.


 1 Replies

Rama chary Rachakonda (Secunderabad/Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294 )     29 June 2015

“material” and “exculpatory” evidence. Material evidence is important evidence that’s directly relevant to an issue in the defendant’s case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence favorable to the defendant in that it clears or tends to clear him of guilt.Exactly what evidence is material and exculpatory depends upon the circumstances of the case. But alibi evidence is virtually always material and exculpatory; it includes witness statements that place the defendant somewhere other than the scene of the crime and forensic evidence (like DNA) that tends to show that the defendant couldn’t have committed the crime.

In order to prove that the evidence was material, the defendant must establish that

  • law enforcement officers had reason to believe the evidence was exculpatory before they destroyed it, and
  • the evidence can’t be replaced by other reasonably available evidence.

Courts can sometimes infer materiality from law enforcement’s actionsFor example, the fact that the state normally preserves the type of evidence that it destroyed in the defendant’s case may show that the evidence was material. Similarly, the government testing, using, or intending to test or use the evidence provides a strong indication that it recognized the importance of that evidence.

Proving bad faith

Proving bad faith is tough. It’s not enough that government actors were careless or negligent with the evidence—the defendant must show willful, deceitful, or malicious intent. The government failing to follow standard procedures when it lost or destroyed evidence can support an inference of bad faith. An example of bad faith is an officer throwing away a fingerprint sample showing that someone other than the defendant committed the crime.


There are several possible remedies for defendants who learn during trial that the state violated the duty to preserve evidence. They can ask the court to suppress related evidence, exclude or limit testimony about the missing evidence, or dismiss the case. If the missing evidence doesn’t surface until after a conviction, overturning the conviction and obtaining a new trial on appeal are possible.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Related Threads