Civil Procedure Code (CPC)

Citations required for 498a quash

Dear learned counsel,
Can anyone let me know how many days of receipt of cheque bounce notice can summon be issue? Is there any limitation period to receive the receipt of notice?


Dear Members,

Please provide me with Judgements for quashing of 498A in following circumstances, I had read earlier but not able to locate the judgement:

Wife gives false complaint of harassment in local police station, and with help of police threathens husband for divorce, removes her mangal sutra etc documented in NC case, and then when husband sends mutual divorce petition, wife fiels false 498a against husband.



Retired employee.

@Chetankumar:  Please do not post your query, in unrelated, not relevant query opened by some others  Post your query separately if you can not locate the judgment in google search

Secunderabad/Highcourt practice watsapp no.9989324294

The general period of Limitation in case of the dishonor of cheque

Presentation of Cheque by Payee at the Bank Within 3 months from date of issue or the date mentioned in the cheque, whichever is earlier
Notice to the Payer demanding payment Within 30 days from the date of receipt of information from the bank
Payment by the Payer Within 15 days from the date of receipt of notice
Filing of Case u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Within 30 days from the date of expiry of above mentioned 15 days




Vague and confused facts.

Re-post  the facts, if it is not hypothetical or academic


There  are two quietists using the same thread with  differnt queries on two different subjects 

Time limit for sending summons in the cheque bounce case:

The time taken by court to send the summons to the accused n the cheque bounce cae may not be  a huge time however it depends on the burden of the court.

There is no prescribed time limit for this purpose.




What is your concern / problem / locus standi with limitation qua issuance of summons to an accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881/ fu, which a process/ functioning of concerned office of the Court ?

However, till date parliamentarian could not imagine/ presume/ find any such requirement to fix limitation /restriction upon the Courts to issue summons of accused within such and such period.




Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


  Search Forum



Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query
Civil Litigation Course     |    x