KSM 20 September 2025

Christian man & hindu woman -married in temple non registered (valid ?)

Hi,

If a Christian man married a Hindu woman in a small temple. The temple issues a challan like thing. The marriage was further not registered under special marriage act. So it is invalid Ab Infinto or something like that is what i read. Its already invalid from begining.

So can he approach court now (20 yrs they have been married or living). The court is not even going to annule the marriage only declare its condition as invalid from begining. Will this petition be allowed even though 20 yrs have passed. And will court only consider it as petition for declaration of nullity or will it allow her to say the usual lies of he hit me, or he owes me money, etc, and is she entitled to maintenance (no kids, she earns 5x his earning pa). Can she even claim maintenance etc when the case is only for nullity, i heard court wont even consider those arguements as the case only pertains to declaration of nullity.

Plz advise.

Reply Follow

11 Replies

Vishesh K Sapra (Advocate Supreme Court (888-215-3399)) 22 September 2025

Hi,

A marriage between a Christian man and a Hindu woman performed in a Hindu temple without conversion and without registration under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 is not valid in the eyes of law. Hindu marriage rites cannot apply unless both parties are Hindus. For interfaith marriages, the only valid route is the Special Marriage Act. So technically, the marriage was void ab initio (invalid from the very beginning). The challan issued by the temple has no legal standing as proof of a valid marriage.

Even after 20 years of living together, the Christian man can approach the court for a declaration of nullity under the relevant provisions of the Special Marriage Act or through a declaratory civil suit. The passage of time does not make an invalid marriage valid. Courts have in several rulings clarified that if the marriage itself is void from inception, it can be declared so whenever approached.

As for the wife’s claims, the main petition will be for declaration of nullity, but the court does have discretion to entertain incidental claims like maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code if she is “unable to maintain herself.” However, in your case, since she earns five times more than the husband, she would not qualify for maintenance. Allegations of cruelty, harassment, or financial demands are generally considered in divorce or domestic violence cases, not in a pure declaration of nullity petition. So unless she files a separate case under those laws, those issues won’t arise in the nullity petition.

In simple words, yes, the husband can file now and the petition is maintainable. The court will primarily examine the validity of the marriage and is unlikely to get into her unrelated allegations. Maintenance is also not a concern here given her much higher income.

To start with, I can help you prepare and file the petition for declaration of nullity in the courts and ensure that the matter is presented cleanly without scope for unnecessary allegations. Feel free to reach out to me on adv.vishesh@icloud.com.

P. Venu (Advocate) 22 September 2025

To my understing, long habitation makes the couple husband and wife in the eyes of the law. As to the other aspects, they are too omnibus and hypothetical to make any menaingful suggestion.

KSM 23 September 2025

But once declaration is petitioned (100% she doesnt have any spl marriage regn) so it will surely be granted ? and once its declared null, after that theres no husband wife validity anymore. Can she still file divorce, or maintenance, just to harass the mans peace of mind. Or once the court issues declaration of Nullity its over. And nothing related as a wife she can claim ?

What if she now converts into christian quickly just for this case ?

P. Venu (Advocate) 23 September 2025

The posting suggests deeper issues. Please post complete facts.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 25 September 2025

An unregistered interfaith marriage (Hindu and Christian) is likely not valid under Indian law, as the Special Marriage Act, 1954, requires registration for legal recognition, and the Madras High Court has recently ruled that such unregistered interfaith marriages are null and void.

The Supreme Court has also emphasized the compulsory nature of marriage registration for all marriages, regardless of religion.

The Madras High Court ruling declared a marriage between a Hindu woman and a Christian man null and void because it was not registered under the Special Marriage Act, despite being solemnized under Hindu rites.

A religious ceremony alone is insufficient for legal validity in interfaith unions

The very legality of inter-faith marriages, involving a Hindu and a non-Hindu, will come under a cloud unless they are registered under the Special Marriage ..

The maintenance aspect cannot be decided in this case, however she can file a maintenance case because even living together for decades will be consdiered as married couple for the purpose of granting maintenance

KSM 25 September 2025

How Sir, once it is decalred null n void. Then she ceases to have right to claim maintenance right ?

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 26 September 2025

A wife can claim maintenance, including for 20 years of marriage, even if the court declared the marriage null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Supreme Court has clarified that a spouse in a void marriage can seek permanent alimony under Section 25 and interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Act, with the final decision dependent on the specific facts and conduct of both parties.

The granting of maintenance is discretionary and depends on the specific facts of the case and the conduct of both parties involved.

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sections 11, 24, and 25 - Void marriages - Spouse of a marriage declared void under Section 11 of the Act is entitled to claim permanent alimony or maintenance under Section 25 - Grant of relief depends on the facts of each case and conduct of the parties - Held, the power to grant such relief is discretionary.

A spouse whose marriage has been declared void under Section 11 of the 1955 Act is entitled to seek permanent alimony or maintenance from the other spouse by invoking Section 25 of the 1955 Act. Whether such a relief of permanent alimony can be granted or not always depends on the facts of each case and the conduct of the parties. The grant of relief under Section 25 is always discretionary;

While enacting Section 25(1), the legislature has made no distinction between a decree of divorce and a decree declaring marriage as a nullity. Therefore, on a plain reading of Section 25(1), it will not be possible to exclude a decree of nullity under Section 11 from the purview of Section 25(1) of the 1955 Act.

When a decree is sought under Sections 9 to 13 and is declined by the court, the remedy under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, remains available to the wife. Even the remedy under Section 125 CrPC or Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' continues to be available.

KSM 28 September 2025

But if such wife is earning much much higher than the husband and there are no children ?

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 29 September 2025

If the wife is earning and drawing a handsome sum as salary income and is able to sustain her expenses including the standard of living that she was enjoying in the company of her partner and the husband establishes her income details with documentary evidences before court, then the court may not be incliined to grant her maintenance and her petition for maintenance would be dismissed

KSM 30 September 2025

Yes Sir, shes earning high. Has own bungalow giant size joint owned by him. And shes earning 5x his earning. Hes only freelance and no assured income slab.