Fir,
Complalintnt stated in FIR that
He himself and on behalf of his two brother he visited extension officer residence at evening for the purpose of getting subsidi application.
Furter he stated that, extension officer told him that you will get Rs. 1800/ rupees subsidi and you will had to pay RS. 900/ 50% to him (extension officer )
The fact is that
When complainant himself and two brother total applicant are 3 person, complainant father deceased and his mother lived with his one brother, his father is also applicant of subsidi.
As par Complaintant statement in FIR when he was authorised on behalf of his two brother to application of subsidi.
The agriculture land of his deceased father was was not transfer to legal heir names on revenu records till application date.
When complaintant applies for susidi himself and on behalf of his brother which person had file application of subsidi on behalf of his father?
Complaintant stated that his mother is live with his other brother. And his two brother authorised him to process of subsidi application.
That means complaintant also applied for his deceased father.
This is fact in my view. And on record. Thus complaintant applied for (4) application and get total amount Rs. 2200/
Complaintnt intencely hide important detail to make FIR with bad intension.
And so FIR is malafied and with bad intension.
During the trial some other evidence proves this matter.
How can we judge this matter with legal aspect?
Pls. Kindly mention your humble view.
Thanks