Are there any case laws as to Fake Proceedings by judge?
'Fake Proceedings' means Judge falsely purported that Oral Arguments were held and also stating in judgment that 'HEARD BOTH SIDES AT LENGTH', which is contrary to reality (Court had told the Petitioner that 'Judge is too busy' and take adjournment date instead. The senior lawyer of Petitioner expressed displeasure as this had happened twice. But deception played by court and on subsequent short date rejected application calling it'I heard petitioner's ld. legla cousel .... bla bla blaa .... and application has no merits.)
Court steno/clerk who's dishonestly loyal to dishonest judge also played role in preparing the court records of that previous hearing date on which parties were told to take adjournment.
How to tackle this.
Is fake proceedings the correct way to express?
I am not able to find any similar caselaws.