Chicko Sangma 20 February 2020

admissibility of cash memo

Sir, cash memo without customer's name and without sellers' sign and seal, will it be admissible in evidence ? Also it covers which law?

Reply Follow

Quick Summary

This discussion explores the admissibility of cash memos as evidence, particularly when they lack customer names, seller signatures, or seals. While a cash memo serves as proof of payment, its evidentiary value is significantly diminished without these details, potentially rendering it 'worthless paper'. The conversation also touches upon the various laws under which such documents might be relevant, including the IT Act and Contract Act.

2 Replies

Joy Bose 21 February 2020

Hello,

The cash memo is the receipt showing payment made against purchase. If you don't have the customers name in it, then you will not be able to prove it was made against that person. Also, cash memo can be used as evidence in all sorts of civil cases and Acts relating to it like the IT Act, 1963, the Contract Act, the negotiable instrument Act etc.

Regards,
Joy Bose