hello experts, request your kind guidance and advise on my situation.
in her own RCR case, wife accepted in cross examination of being Bcom and MCom, of having worked earlier when she was in husbands home, and she left home because husband deserted her, this was in cross examination of her in her own RCR case. she had also filed 125 case, in that case, she had mentioned that she had not worked and has never mentioned anything about her qualification in her 125 petition. i have defeated her in her own RCR case.
my question is: if she contradicts her own admissions in RCR, in her 125 case, what will happen?
she admits something in one case, and denies something in the other case, which statement will the judge consider in the 125 case?, because she herself admits something in RCR, and denies those same questions in 125 case?