LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Divorce by Desertion-what to prove?

Nitish Banka
Last updated: 02 May 2016
  3 min read    Share   Bookmark


Desertion is also ground for divorce in India, but the most difficult part is how to prove desertion in court of law. A layman may think desertion as his/her spouse is living separately for the period of 2 years that's it. But actually what courts in India require are the 4 things which are to be established by the spouse who is seeking divorce on this ground.

1.. Animus deserendi-This means the intention to desert, if husband or wife decides to leave the martial co habitation as they does not want to continue with martial obligations or may be called husband/wife under the eyes of the society this means they have developed animus deserendi, once this intention is formed this fulfills one criteria for proving desertion. Now this intention can be from both sides or may be a constructive animus deserendi, In constructive animus deserendi when one of the spouse asks the other spouse to leave the house or leave him/her that is constructive animus deserendi other the other form is that the a spouse can leave the other spouse with his/her own will that is willful desertion. in both the situation the affected spouse i.e the spouse which was made to leave in the case of constructive animus deserendi or the spouse which was left alone can pursue the proceeding for divorce if other requirements are satisfied.

2. Separation- Now the  Animus deserendi is followed by actual separation, now this separation can be physical or mental one, normally itrs the physical one here the actual action takes place merely forming an intention or telling a spouse that I will leave you is not suffice if it is not followed by some action. Merely an action without the intention is also not suffice both intention to leave and followed by action is mandatory in proving desertion.Sometime there is first physical separation and then followed by intention and sometimes its vice versa, both should takes place for a continuous period of 2 years.

3. No reasonable just cause to leave- There should not be any reasonable cause available to the spouse who is leaving the matrimonial ties, generally cruelty is alleged by defending spouse to defeat the proceedings of desertion in such cases the burden is on the defending spouse to prove cruelty by examining witnesses and medical examinations etc. But if defending spouse fails to prove any of the just causes then this ingredient stand proved.

LCI Learning

4. without the consent- if the deserting spouse does not consents such desertion this final ingredient also stands proved, but how to prove this ingredient? now let us suppose a spouse leaves then there must be continuous efforts from the other side to b ring back the spouse, it should not be the case where the other spouse sits mutely while the other spouse has deserted. efforts should be made to render reconciliation. here contact with parents, mother father or other relatives are essential. reconciliation at its own level at first and then involvement of relative is essential, this would satisfy the court that deserted spouse never consented for such a desertion.

Proving all the aforementioned ingredients are essential to prove desertion i n court, if any one element is missing divorce cannot be granted. Gene really cases fall short in 3rd and 4th ingredient. merely living separately even willfully does not guarantee divorce to deserting partner.

Nitish Banka

(Advocate Supreme court)

nitish@lexspeak.in


"Loved reading this piece by Nitish Banka?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"






Tags :


Category Family Law, Other Articles by - Nitish Banka 



Comments

9 years ago Kunuthur Srinivasa Reddy

Is the dependent spouse entitled to withdraw cash secretly, the sole earnings of her husband who created a joint account facility meant for family use, after filing a divorce petition in the Family Court?


9 years ago Kunuthur Srinivasa Reddy

Is the dependent spouse entitled to withdraw cash secretly, the sole earnings of her husband who created a joint account facility meant for family use, after filing a divorce petition in the Family Court?


9 years ago Kunuthur Srinivasa Reddy

Is the dependent spouse entitled to withdraw cash secretly, the sole earnings of her husband who created a joint account facility meant for family use, after filing a divorce petition in the Family Court?


9 years ago C.V.S.Jetty

Quite informative. Enlightening. Thank you.


9 years ago Harassed By Wife

How one should focus on the 3rd and 4th Ingredient which goes unproven..?? Kindly put some light on that too!!


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

all the years may be 1000s of years we lived normally; we cannot say today we are some great humans, like a great discovery by this new fangled man as such. it is great self cheating idea.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

i do not agree to the concept of divorce; if you cannot be able to adjust with the other spouse there is something mentally wrong with the spouse proposing the divorce on imaginary grounds; but worse is how this law makers lost their mind when they have to work with the normal people.not some great funny spouses. the earlier they understand a society sociologically it is better, is my considered opinion. these law makers take the advantage of their own funny statutes and they go around scouting for victim for their own fanciful life they want to lead.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

i do not agree to the concept of divorce; if you cannot be able to adjust with the other spouse there is something mentally wrong with the spouse proposing the divorce on imaginary grounds; but worse is how this law makers lost their mind when they have to work with the normal people.not some great funny spouses. the earlier they understand a society sociologically it is better, is my considered opinion. these law makers take the advantage of their own funny statutes and they go around scouting for victim for their own fanciful life they want to lead.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

if marriage only objective is just sex means it is another form of raping only if family idea is not conceived by an idea of 'family'; you have yadavs, pillais, iyers, ,,, is on the basis of this vagrant man only not by the lady who just gives in to your fancies; so law making need to be as far as marriages and families concerned should not botch up only with 'sex or sex orientation and great divorces'; divorces are the western concept but oriental concept ideally made that a family is indeed a great thought of the yore. so allow it to further develop; never make a man more vagabond is a fact in the nutshell. that is the oriental orientation so too in the Europe's developed societies like in Roman empire or Greek empire; we never heart then the great idea of divorces as is very common in the modern man who is day by day is becoming closer to animals thus receding from civilization is the fact.


9 years ago dr g balakrishnan

family building is only by biological processes and not any new thought processes; thoughts go on changing day in and day out; but the natural law never admits one's own ideo-syncrocy!


Show All (18) (Login required)


You are not logged in . Please login to post comments.

Click here to Login / Register