Credit Card Risks in India’s Digital Banking Era: Are Consumers Still in the Dark?

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe famously said, “By seeking and blundering, we learn”. But in the digital financial world, this form of learning is costly, unforgiving, and often irreversible. When it comes to credit card fraud and digital banking risks, learning through personal misfortune is not only unfortunate, it is unacceptable.

Back in 2015, when India’s digital payment space was still in its formative years, I wrote a piece examining whether credit card holders were genuinely being warned about the risks associated with online and card-not-present transactions. It was a period of tremendous digital optimism. Fintech was beginning to reshape how Indians paid, shopped, and saved. But the shift from cash to cards and apps occurred much faster than the average consumer’s understanding of the underlying risks.

A decade later, one would expect a radically safer landscape, fortified by regulation, advanced encryption, real-time alerts, and more informed users. Certainly, many things have improved. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been active and forward-looking, pushing reforms and mandating consumer-centric practices. Banks and payment processors have implemented tokenisation, introduced app-based controls, and layered authentication mechanisms. Yet, despite all these efforts, fraud continues, and often, the user remains unaware until the damage is done.

This article revisits the key concerns I raised ten years ago, placing them within today’s expanded legal and technological context, and exploring how vulnerabilities have simply morphed, not disappeared. The core question remains: have banks truly warned their customers about the full extent of risks?

Beyond OTPs and PINs: The Myth of Digital Safety

A common perception among consumers is that fraud only occurs when one carelessly shares confidential data, CVV, PIN, or OTP. This belief is subtly but consistently reinforced by banks through notifications and advisories. But it is a dangerously incomplete understanding.

The modern fraud landscape does not always rely on what the customer discloses. It often hinges on what the system fails to prevent. Consider a cardholder who takes every recommended precaution but suddenly receives an alert about a transaction made at 3:00 a.m. on a website they’ve never visited. No CVV shared. No OTP given. No international use enabled (or so they thought). The response from the bank? A standard message citing “terms and conditions” and a reference to disclaimers the customer had likely never read.

In reality, fraud today stems not just from user error but from systemic gaps: payment gateways that bypass domestic authentication rules, merchant platforms that fail to encrypt or tokenise properly, subscription services that do not honour cancellations, and banks that treat consumer complaints as exceptions, not red flags.

The illusion of safety is maintained through procedural optics, OTP verifications, in-app notifications, generic awareness campaigns, but the actual risks are often obscured by jargon or hidden in fine print. It is time we acknowledge that compliance is not the same as protection.

How the Legal Architecture Has Evolved

To credit the institutions involved, India’s regulatory foundation for digital transactions is among the most comprehensive globally. The legal spine of this framework lies in the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which empower the Reserve Bank of India to regulate, monitor, and safeguard electronic transactions.

In 2009, well before many countries had robust online transaction guidelines, the RBI issued a circular that introduced the Additional Factor of Authentication (AFA), a requirement that every online card-not-present transaction be verified by a dynamic second factor, typically an OTP. This positioned India as a pioneer in online payment security.

Subsequent circulars in 2010 and 2011 expanded the scope of AFA to cover IVR transactions, recurring mandates, and even certain cross-border payments. In response to evasive routing tactics by some banks and merchants, where payments were processed through international gateways to avoid AFA, the RBI issued further clarifications. All cards issued in India, it said, must comply with AFA, regardless of where the transaction was executed, provided there was no actual foreign exchange involved.

These interventions culminated in the Master Direction, Credit Card and Debit Card Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022, which now stand as the most consolidated and binding legal document on the matter. Under this, card issuers are mandated to:

• Seek explicit consumer consent before activating card services;
• Enable users to enable/disable domestic, international, contactless, and online features via apps and portals;
• Issue real-time transaction alerts with actionable insights;
• Clearly define user and bank liability in the event of unauthorised transactions.

Another major milestone came in 2022 with the RBI’s mandate for tokenisation, which prohibits merchants and payment aggregators from storing actual card numbers. Transactions must now be conducted using randomly generated tokens that are unique to the user, device, and merchant. While tokenisation reduces the risk of data breaches, it is not a substitute for user awareness.

Looking ahead, the RBI’s proposed risk-based authentication framework, set to launch in April 2026, aims to differentiate between high-risk and low-risk transactions based on parameters such as geography, frequency, and behavioural patterns. This marks a transition from blanket security to contextual security, a move that balances safety with user convenience.

But despite these regulatory tools, fraud persists. Why?

The Modern Threats: Sophisticated, Scalable, and Subtle

1.Social Engineering and Remote Access
Cyber criminals no longer need your card number, they just need your trust. A call pretending to be from your bank, a message mimicking an official helpline, or an app that promises cashback but steals your data, this is the new face of fraud. In many cases, users are manipulated into downloading remote access tools or clicking malicious links disguised as “KYC verification” messages.

2.Unregulated Subscription Models
Many foreign merchants initiate recurring charges with minimal user consent. Even after a user cancels the service, the charges persist. While RBI regulations cover such scenarios, especially when AFA is not applied, redress often depends on the user’s ability to contest, document, and follow through.

3.Cross-Border Fraud via Routing Loopholes
Some merchants or payment gateways route transactions through international networks, even for domestic services, to bypass Indian security protocols. This makes the transaction exempt from AFA, exposing users to charges they never authorised or authenticated.

4.Token and Merchant Platform Vulnerabilities
While tokenisation improves security, poorly implemented merchant platforms may still be compromised. Fraudsters exploit weaknesses in third-party apps, collect metadata, and target users through phishing campaigns that mirror real transaction patterns.

5.Micro-Testing Before Full-Scale Fraud
It is now common for fraudsters to test a stolen card by initiating a transaction of ₹1 or ₹2. If successful, they follow it with higher-value charges. These micro-transactions often escape user attention and are not flagged by automated systems.

What the Law Provides, and What Consumers Must Do

The RBI has made it clear: if a transaction occurs without user authorisation, and the consumer reports it promptly, the liability shifts to the bank. Moreover, banks are not permitted to deny reversals simply by pointing to terms and conditions if AFA was not applied.

The RBI’s Integrated Ombudsman Scheme has further simplified grievance redress, allowing consumers to file complaints online and seek prompt adjudication. Under these rules:

• The bank must acknowledge complaints within 24 hours;
• A final response must be issued within 30 days;
• The customer has a right to escalate to the RBI Ombudsman if unsatisfied.

That said, the onus of documentation still rests on the user. In the event of fraud:

1. Block the card immediately, and secure a complaint number.
2. Change all linked credentials, from net banking to email passwords.
3. Preserve all records: screenshots, messages, emails, and call logs.
4. Report the matter on the Cyber Crime Portal (www.cybercrime.gov.in) and also call 1930 for urgent financial fraud support.
5. Visit the local cybercrime police station to lodge a written complaint, especially for high-value fraud.
6. File a formal complaint on the RBI Complaint Management System if the bank fails to act within the prescribed time.

Recovery in fraud cases is a race against time. In many instances, the money moves through multiple accounts within minutes, often across borders, making retrieval impossible without immediate intervention.

The Real Risk: Asymmetry of Information

Why, despite such a detailed legal framework, does fraud persist? The answer lies in a persistent and deeply embedded information gap. Banks and institutions are equipped with technical tools, legal protections, and compliance systems. Consumers, however, are often left to navigate digital finance through trial, error, and regret.

In-app controls for disabling international use, setting transaction limits, and managing subscriptions exist, but they are neither highlighted nor explained. The average cardholder does not know that they can disable online usage, set validity time windows, or restrict transaction types. And so, when fraud occurs, users are blamed for “not using the controls properly”, controls they were never taught to use in the first place.

Moreover, banking apps and websites often prioritise marketing over user education. New offers, cashback deals, and loan eligibility prompts overshadow security tutorials and fraud alerts. This imbalance needs to be corrected if digital finance is to be sustainable.

A Decade Later: Lessons Learned and Lessons Lost

Ten years have passed since I first warned of these risks. In that time, the ecosystem has changed dramatically, but the core vulnerability remains unchanged: uninformed usage.

The RBI has done more than most central banks to protect consumers. Banks have upgraded their systems. Fintech has introduced innovations like never before. But unless the end-user is brought into the security conversation, the architecture remains incomplete.

The modern cardholder must move beyond passive reliance on institutional safeguards. Caution today is not an afterthought, it is an operating principle. Every digital transaction is a legal act. It must be entered into with both consent and comprehension.

Conclusion: Regulation Can Guide, But Only Awareness Can Guard

India’s digital financial revolution is irreversible. But revolutions, by nature, are disruptive. The security of millions of consumers cannot rely solely on systems, servers, and statutes. It must also depend on an aware, empowered, and proactive citizen.

Technology can protect the infrastructure. Law can enforce compliance. But the final firewall is always human awareness.

Let us build systems that don’t just prevent fraud, but anticipate it, educate against it, and respond to it with dignity and efficiency. That will be the true mark of a mature financial ecosystem.

Connect with the Author: advocatezaryab@gmail.com
Connect:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/advocatezaryab/

About the Author

Md. Zaryab Jamal Rizvi is an Advocate practicing before the Supreme Court of India and the Founding Partner of LCZF (Law Chambers of Zaryab & Firdouse), New Delhi. A first-generation lawyer with nearly two decades of experience, he has built a distinguished practice in commercial litigation, arbitration, and financial regulatory disputes, representing leading brokerage houses, financial institutions, corporates, and statutory bodies before commercial courts, arbitral tribunals, and constitutional forums across India.

He serves as a Board Member of the U.P. Shia Central Waqf Board, a statutory body under the Waqf Act, 1995, and is a trained mediator. Deeply committed to access to justice, he has served on the Specialised Panel of the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) and continues to contribute significantly through pro bono and legal-aid work.

Alongside his litigation practice, Mr. Rizvi actively engages with academia as Adjunct Faculty at Symbiosis Law School, Noida, where he teaches Banking Law and mentors young lawyers through lectures, panel discussions, and legal forums. Recognised with the Young Achiever in Law (Under 40) Award and the Lex Falcon Global Award (Dubai, 2022), he is known for his detail-oriented advocacy, strategic acumen, and dedication to advancing the profession through mentorship and public engagement.