Any law for putting my talk in court my self
vikas
(Querist) 05 September 2014
This query is : Resolved
dear sir,
i have some query plz reply. thanks to all.
1. there is any law in criminal cases so that i could put my talk/contradiction in faviour of my relative accused in trial court without any advocate. because my advocate is afraid from informant.
2. if i put my talk with help of posting registry in trial court. it will be helpfull.
3. can i send registry under any law so that it could become a admissible evidence for magistrate.
4.i filled RTI in trial court for demanding S.R. report he refuse and replied S.R. report not comes in court it goes to S.P. you can got from there. on other hand i saw S.R. report in our case file of court office with the help of court cleark. on that report no magistrate signature and time stamp was there. then how it will be prove when SR comes in court. i know very well SR was 2 days late because of false case.so court is refusing to giving SR.i also filled rti to SP he also refused to give.
now there is any procedure for it comes in record.
i read many SC ruling that SR delaying can not affecting the prosecution case.
thanks
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 05 September 2014
If you are not accused then you cannot say anything to court unless you are witness. Enter the court during trial and offer to be witness or send your submission to to court and you will be summoned as witness.
If you feel lawyer is not competent or siding with opposite party then you can change him.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 05 September 2014
You can not speak in court as long as you have engaged an advocate.
vikas
(Querist) 05 September 2014
dear Sudhir sir,
how to send submission to to court so that i got summoned as witness
thanks
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 05 September 2014
let the accused produce you as witness if you know truth in his favour.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 05 September 2014
ACADEMIC QUERY BY STUDENT
IF NOT; QUERIST HAD ENGAGED ADVOCATE AND CAN ASK HIM....... Missing dead child !!!!!!!case of his relative;; if true!!!
ajay sethi
(Expert) 05 September 2014
if you have engaged a lawyer only he can a sk questions
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 05 September 2014
what the advocate of your lawyer says. Are you really useful as a witness.
malipeddi jaggarao
(Expert) 05 September 2014
If the accused seeks information under RTI act the response should be positive. Why you have stepped into his shoes?
Normally No advocate will entertain fears and will not afraid of anybody. You discuss your ideas with the advocate of the accused and find out whether these ideas can be practically implemented for the benefit of accused.
P. Venu
(Expert) 05 September 2014
The accused has got the right to produce all the evidence in support of his defence. It is his choice to call or summon you as a witness or otherwise.
vikas
(Querist) 06 September 2014
dear all sir
firstly i am telling to V R SHROFF sir this not acamedic query.
i search this blog by google. then i registered with it i think every blog is a platform to get advice and share advice/thought. if you have problem i could stop this.
1.this is real i can produce all doc to u for your belive.
2. the another things is that my advocate is afraid because the informant is famous and having political power every lawyer can engagged with me but can't help. i told to my advocate many time before 313 statement that i can produced 2-3 witness so plz wrote statement according. but he refused it and told there is no need. and gave a substatement of 233 under 313. he has left no option 4 me that i can gave any witness or produced any doc in favour of innocent accused relative. some one told me that i can gave affidavid U/s 296 crpc.
i am human not god so i can only belive him i can't know automatically what he is thinking.may god will help us.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 07 September 2014
you are still not describing what is the case and how you are connected with the case and what facts you know.
vikas
(Querist) 07 September 2014
dear sir
dear Sudhir Kumar sir i don't want tell relation to any one but on your request accused is not other person he is my father. i understand very well with fighting case in last 6 yrs that now a day mostly people can laugh and enjoy with my feeling but no one can't help. so i was not telling relation to any one but i want help my father till my last breath.
in 6 yrs i change 3 advocate but all was same meet with informant. i think all advocate fight for only money very bad but some good advocate fight for money, name and fame and justice. i know money is priority for all professional that is not bad but fight for only extracting money from both party that is bad. ok don't mind plz. i think you got your first answer. now comes on second point
case is 302,364. informant and police having no evidence for both section except only falsly eye witness created by informant. police arrest my father on 23 but they are showing on 27 after 4 days of arresting. police not filled any GD or entry for supporting this.they created eye witness for 364. 302 is fully circumtences. i am not law student i learn many thing with fighting case in court and reading many book because of none intresting my advocate. my all query is based on problem that i am facing in court then i search solution in my book and internet because both are reliable. i know well problem can't be solved if i change the advocate and i have not more money for this. because father is mine so fight is also mine and duty. i purchage 2 book police regulation and criminal major act. i find solution in that book but many thing in pratically are different from book. i post 2 blog for this other is
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Missing-report-can-be-fir-or-not--493461.asp#.VAvkmtySzaE
ok thanks a lot for your reply.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 07 September 2014
read the above story.
sad.
But given facts still do not indicate if you are a in knowledge of facts and whether your evidence can be of any help to your father.
vikas
(Querist) 07 September 2014
dear sir,
dear sudhir sir firstly i am happy with u that u could understand me. else giving me academic tag but i don't mind because they are giving something not taking. like half glass water some says that glass is half empty and some one says half filled with water.
i have only following evidence
1.single evidence for arresting father on 23 sep that i got from RTI from police department. but after substatement u/s 233 under 313 how i can submit this RTI info. the other point of fearing is gov. advocate and peskar hos got money from informant and judge(ADJ SPECIAL) has good relationship with gov. advocate. so i want submit this through high court or distric judge so that RTI info will be count as evidence.
2.missing report registered on 23sep after that police started investigation that means it will be the first information report because police can't start any investigation without FIR. then informant gave second info at 25 sep the same is registered as FIR ignoring 23 info. on other hand 23sep info should be FIR and the information of 25 sep should be the part of investigation.
3. i filled RTI in session court for asking S.R. report court replied that SR not comes in court it goes to S.P. you can got from there. but i read in crpc 157 it goes to judicial magistrate also. why court is denying.
4.i found many fake thing in police document which police submited in court but when i submit a request to got the certified copy of that document court is saying that no certified copy can be issued of any photocopied document. on other hand accused has legal right to got all copy from court.
5. police not prepared any site map for abducting child while the main incident place of abducting is main. he submit site map where body was recovered.
sir if u want i can share missing report and fir with u.
thanks & regd
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 08 September 2014
But given facts still do not indicate if you are a in knowledge of facts and whether your evidence can be of any help to your father.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 08 September 2014
If you are confident of our evidence, change the lawyer and initiate the process of summoning you as a witness from defence side and go ahead.
