Should Katju's charges of political interference in judicial appointment be probed? |
|
Yes | 81 % |
![]() |
|
No | 15 % |
![]() |
|
Cant Say | 4 % |
![]() |
|
Total Votes Cast : 111 | |
Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
Posted by Ankur Agrawal |
21/08/2014 16:02:30 |
yes....... | |
Posted by Ankur Agrawal |
21/08/2014 16:00:44 |
yes....... | |
Posted by Ajay Paplu |
15/08/2014 11:48:21 |
no comments | |
Posted by Deepak Chitnis |
13/08/2014 13:08:26 |
Yes! He is a Senior, responsible person and should be taken seriously. | |
Posted by Isaac Gabriel |
10/08/2014 17:47:50 |
Political wisdom is the powerful weapon in democracy.So no use in sparing time time to anaalyse its pros and cons. | |
Posted by Kunal Sharma |
07/08/2014 14:54:38 |
everything should be fair | |
Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) |
05/08/2014 19:29:38 |
Yes it should be done. | |
Posted by
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate ![]() |
02/08/2014 22:26:18 |
Yes the charges are not of ordinary in nature and also since the issue involves the top political person's interference for political gains, this cannot be allowed to remain in-probed. | |
Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
01/08/2014 14:09:30 |
The delay in opening the Red Taped file after much water has flown, what could be its result | |
Posted by Punit Gupta |
30/07/2014 20:24:02 |
Should be probed to the end and the results should be made public as well, that people could raise their voice against any such thing. | |
Posted by R.K Nanda |
28/07/2014 16:54:53 |
yes. r.k.nanda-adv-supreme court | |
Posted by Sanjay Agarwal |
27/07/2014 19:40:01 |
Justice Kattju opened his eyes after many years. Failed to even give the name of High Court judge. Naming three Ex CJI who helped that particular judge Publicity stunt | |