On 18th February, the Supreme Court closed the suo-moto proceedings which were instituted to examine if there was a "larger conspiracy" behind the allegations of sexual harassment against the then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.
The Court held that no merit was found in the criminal M.C. and was thus dismissed, considering the fact and circumstances of the case.
To answer the both questions asked in the beginning, suspicion, no matter how strong, can not constitute as proof, unless the circumstantial evidence passes the test of principles, as provided by the Shanta Devi v. State of Rajasthan case. That is se
The current case speaks in regard with the prevention of wasting an academic year in lieu with tampering of answer sheets and mark statements of 200+ candidates appearing in the examinations of Maharashtra State Board of Higher and Secondary Educatio
The following judgment deals with the provisions of Sec. 80HH of Income Tax Act, 1961, in addition to the provisions of Sec. 80C to 80U of the act, which deal with the deductions made from gross income a company earns from the assessment year.
The court directed the SHO of the concerned police station or any other responsible police officer to accompany the complainant and present her before the Medical Superintendent, AIIMS to get her pregnancy terminated where Board of two medical practi
In the following judgement, the Supreme Court of India is dealing with section 21 of Recovery of Debt and Bankruptcy Act which deals with deposit of amount of due debt for filing appeal before DRAT. The question before the court was of the extent to
Kashmira Devi vs. State of Uttarakhand. Is a case of cruelty and dowry death. The essence of a dying declaration is also clarified via this judgement by the learned high court and supreme court. The decision of the trial court to acquit the appellant
The following order deals withSections147/148/149/365/326/153A/302//395/120B under IPC.Section147 deals with punishment for rioting.
This judgement deals with the issue of inter marriages and the right to choice of marriage. Also, the judgement looks into the issue whether the consent of family and community necessary for marriage or not. It looks into Article 21 of the Con