. These two appeals have been filed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in CCC(Crl.) Nos. 7 and 12 of 2002 dated 18.8.2004 by which the appellant has been convicted for committing criminal contempt of cou..
The respondent herein, along with his mother and wife, purchased a property in No.7, Community Center, East of Kailash, New Delhi, in an open auction conducted by the DDA on 10.8.1969. Possession of the plot was made over to the purchasers on 5th Mar..
The petitioner has impleaded the Union of India and all the 36 States/Union Territories as party-respondents to the present petition. This Court, vide its order dated 28th July, 2006 issued notice to all the respondents. Some of the States and the Un..
..
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YES ..
(1) Euthanasia - Right to die - Legality - In 1973, petitioner, staff nurse at King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEM hospital), was sexually assaulted and choked, leaving her blind, deaf, paralysed and in a vegetative state - In 1999, 'X' as petitioner'..
Human Rights -- Procedure to be adopted by the High Court when Euthanasia application is filed - Which provision of law provided thar the court can grant approval for withdrawing life support to an incompetent person ..
Human Rights - Passive Euthanasia and Active Euthanasia - Legality..
Validity of Appointment - High Powered Committee (HPC), duly constituted under proviso to Section 4(1) of Central Vigilance Commission Act 2003 recommended name of 2nd respondent for appointment to post of Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) - Petit..
Entitlement to Regularization - Appellant organization employed casual workers for discharging various works in its organization - Respondent Union of casual workers demanded regularization of their service - Single Judge, in respondent's writ petiti..
Service - Preparation of judgments through third party - Removal from service - Legality (i) Whether High Court was justified in dispensing with enquiry while passing order recommending appellant's removal (ii) Whether order of removal ..
The appellant herein challenged the legality of the aforesaid order before the Jharkhand High Court by filing a writ petition contending inter alia that the High Court does not have any power to dispense with an enquiry as envisaged for the purpose o..
The appellant herein submitted his application offering himself as a candidate for the post of Munsif to be recruited by the respondents for which an advertisement was also issued. Pursuant to the aforesaid application filed by the appellant, he was ..
The appellant Jagdish Rai, along with another accused Ajaib Singh is convicted under section 18 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) and sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1 lak..
The respondent, a veterinary surgeon, was in the service of the State Government of Uttar Pradesh. On December 23, 1991, he made an application for no-objection certificate for obtaining visa for going to the United States of America. The no-objectio..
. The petitioner has approached this Court under the provisions of Article 32 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that the respondents be directed not to demolish Shop No. D/4, Peeragarhi Relief Camp, New Delhi-56 till another shop is given to..
The facts very briefly are that the Government of Bihar in the Department of Human Resource Development granted temporary recognition to the Champaran Physical Training College (for short ‘the College’) for C.P.Ed. (Certificate of Physical Education)..
The issue that falls for consideration in these appeals is, as to whether the provisions of time limit that are contained in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (in short ‘the Act’) are applicable to the recovery of amounts due under the comp..
The facts of the case are that the petitioners filed complaints under section 28 read with items l (a)(b), (d) and (f) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, l97l (hereinafter refe..
Being aggrieved by an order dated 5th November, 2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 7435 of 1979 by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, this Special Leave Petition has been filed by the heirs of the Original Plaintiff, who had filed a suit for a ..
Member Strength 9,56,780 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
