The judgement majorly deals with interpretation of section 309 of IPC which criminalises attempt to suicide. The question before the Madras High Court was whether hunger strike would amount to attempt to suicide under section 309 IPC or not. ..
This judgement deals with circumstantial evidence and the grounds on which circumstantial evidences can be relied upon for a conviction. The question before the court was whether the decision of a High Court was correct in quashing the order of the T..
This case deals with the definition of the term “profits chargeable to tax” as given in the provisions of Sec. 41 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
The nature of allegations against the appellant are very serious. In copulation of all the facts and merits of the case it was denounced that, besides the condition to be imposed by the trial Court while releasing the respondent, it would serve the b..
This case relates to the case filed by Kanagana Ranaut when parts of her office were demolished by the BMC. Senior Advocate Aspi Chinoy had represented then for which he was paid 82.5 Lakh rupees by BMC. The petition in this case was filed challengin..
This judgement deals with section 89 of Code of Civil Procedure which deals with settlement. The question before the court was whether the parties who privately settle disputes without the intervention of Court are entitled to refund of Court fee or ..
The Apex Court upheld the conviction of the accused and the appeal was set aside. The Court held that even though the witnesses had turned hostile, the evidence of murder weapon, blood stains and other materials were sufficient to prove the crime of ..
The Court held that the tape recorded statements were inadmissible in evidence and that such an evidence would not have any probative value to inspire any confidence. The appellants could not prove the guilt of the respondent beyond reasonable doubt ..
The appellants were held to be not guilty for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 120-B and Section 201 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code...
The court held that the tests violated the accused person’s right against self-incrimination under Art.20 (3), and the right to life and personal liberty under Art. 21...
Whether voice identification can be deemed as admissible evidence as per the provisions of the Evidence Act...
The court set aside the impugned judgment and allowed for the appeal to be filed by the appellant. ..
In summary, it can be said that in this particular judgment, the Karnataka High Court made it clear that an already concluded assessment could not be reopened merely because of the ‘change of opinion’ of the Assessment Officer. It was clear from the ..
The judgment, basically deals with two aspects of law, one being the extent of the arbitration clause and the other being the revocability of agency. The court emphasized on the extent of section 202 and 221 of Indian contract act, and also interpret..
This judgement deals with the interpretation of section 65B(4) which lays down provision for certificate when a statement in evidence is to be given. The question before the Court was whether it is necessary to file a certificate at the time of produ..
It was held that the impugned order is unsustainable. Hence, the revision is allowed and the order by the Allahabad High Court dated 13.3.2013 is set aside...
The following judgement deals the appeal which was filed against the judgment dated 21.05.2015 of High Court of Punjab & Haryana by which LPA No.1747 of 2014 filed by the appellant has been dismissed. The LPA was filed by the appellant challenging th..
On 18th February, the Supreme Court closed the suo-moto proceedings which were instituted to examine if there was a "larger conspiracy" behind the allegations of sexual harassment against the then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi...
The Court held that no merit was found in the criminal M.C. and was thus dismissed, considering the fact and circumstances of the case...
To answer the both questions asked in the beginning, suspicion, no matter how strong, can not constitute as proof, unless the circumstantial evidence passes the test of principles, as provided by the Shanta Devi v. State of Rajasthan case. That is se..
Member Strength 9,48,934 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
