The Delhi High Court in this judgement agreed with the Trial Court in denying the relief of specific performance to the appellant. However, regarding the third issue, the court set aside the decision of the Trial Court that the suit is within limitat..
The following judgement deals with the Pvt. Ltd COMPANY APPEAL NO.22 OF 2013 explains the law on Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act which deal with oppression of the minority and mismanagement...
The following writ petition deals with Article 226 under the Constitution of India. This writ petition is filed in prayer of quashing the circulate dated 09.11.2020 issued by the R-2 VIDE annexure and etc; as it imposes examinations through offline m..
The following judgement deals the disposal of the present bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 656/2020 registered U/s 376/506 IPC at Poli..
After a series of recent orders, the First Bench of the Madras High Court has announced its waning tolerance for frivolous cases and public interest litigation (which will be mentioned in the overview) preferred without there being any public interes..
The following judgement deals with section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 which is the interpretation clause and lays down the meaning of the expression "evidence"..
The Supreme Court has held that the NEET slice off percentile for admissions to BDS (dental) seats be diminished and confirmations will be made till eighteenth February 2021 to fill the seats lying empty. ..
Reservation in India has its genesis from the age old practice of caste system which divided society into upper and lower classes and the lowest amongst them were the untouchables. This system thus recognises Brahmans as highest, the class lower to t..
The object behind the POCSO Act was to safeguard children from sexual offences which received a massive jolt when the Bombay High Court acquitted the person accused of sexual assault against a 5 year old girl. ..
More often than not, conflicts take place in households and such conflicts happen even more when it comes to matrimonial cases. This particular judgment puts light on the conflict between the rights of the in-laws and the daughter-in-law. Not only th..
It was decided that the Respondent's allegations were not in public interest but only to abuse the process of the court and to harass the Appellant. The Respondent has been restrained from intervening any further in this issue or be a party in this c..
Regardless of whether an individual is in legal guardianship regarding the examination of the prior case, he can officially be captured with respect to his inclusion in the distinctive case and partner him with the examination of that other case and ..
In this judgment the said statements were published in various newspapers. ..
Culmination of all the points stated above, the order was given accordingly. The petitioners had placed reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in Free Legal Aid Committee, Jamshedpur v. State of Bihar. 1982 3 SCC 378, the Supreme Court took into ..
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court to put simply in words was held that it would be to say that “the effect of the words used in the offending material must be judged from the standards of reasonable, strong-minded, firm and courageous men, an..
The court set aside the order of the Odisha HC, thereby allowing the appeals...
The appeal of MSL was allowed and the order of the NCLAT was set aside...
By the way of this judgment, the honorable High Court has clearly stated that the right to approach the Court under Article 226 can only be exercised when a legal right exists. It cannot be used in the absence of any legal rights. It was clearly stat..
A 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court consisting of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra and Krishna Murari have, through the judgment in the case- Hari Om alias Hero v. State of U.P., delivered on January 5, 2021, held that all the three appellan..
In the judgment of the case – Iqbal Basith and others v. N. Subbalakshmi and others, delivered on December 14, 2020, a 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court, consisting of Justices R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha and Krishna Murari, has considered the factors..