Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

No Reason to Interfere by Appellate Court if order i not perverse

Raj Kumar Makkad ,
  21 December 2010       Share Bookmark

Court :
Bombay High Court
Brief :
Rejection of Tribe Claim by The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee
Citation :
Shri Sunil S/o Baliram Maddewad vs. The State of Maharashtra, Department of Tribal Development, its Secretary and Ors. (Decided on 13.12.2010) MANU/MH/1658/2010

Held, Committee has given personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter passed the impugned order. It has also considered the documents produced by the petitioner before it and obtained information from the petitioner about tradition, occupation, God/Goddesses, Surnames, customs, culture, affinity etc. and came to the conclusion that the petitioner failed to prove his affinity and ethnic linkage towards "Mahadeo Koli" Scheduled Tribe. Committee also considered the Vigilance Cell report, and also enquired and obtained the information about the petitioner's affinity and ethnic linkage towards "Mahadeo Koli" Scheduled Tribe and

thereafter passed the impugned order, invalidating the tribe claim of the Petitioner, and there does not appear to be any flaw therein and the said order cannot be faulted with. Accordingly, we do not find any glaring infirmity or perversity in the impugned order

 
"Loved reading this piece by Raj Kumar Makkad?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"



Published in Constitutional Law
Views : 1458




Comments





Latest Judgments


More »