The service of court notices by e-mail was extended in addition to the modes of service mentioned in the Supreme Court Rules. At that time, for time bring, the facility was extended to commercial litigation and for those cases where the Advocate(s)-o..
The court under section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code held that the Plaintiff has a choice of forum and can file a suit in a place where the cause of action arises and therefore, the High Court was not justified in upsetting the order of First Appel..
In a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Vinay Vats v. Fox Star Studios India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. in I.A. 6351/2020 in CS(COMM) 291/2020 delivered on July 30, 2020, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that there can be no copyright in an idea/..
The SC declared that the insurance company is bound to pay the farmers the value of their goods stored in the cold storage as they are the beneficiaries and to meet the amount which the bank loaned to the farmers out of such payment...
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal & set the impugned orders...
LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS: CPC CPC- Lecture 3 - 26th August- Case Analysis of all the recent and landmark judgements relating to Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ..
LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS: CPC CPC- Lecture 2- 25th August- Case Analysis of all the recent and landmark judgements relating to Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the impugned judgement of HC. There is no bar to file an application under Order 1 Rule 10 when application under Order 22 Rule 4 has been dismissed...
The court held that there are two tests to be satisfied for determining the question of who is a necessary party..
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The jurisdiction of other courts has not been excluded in the contract. ..
It was held by the court that the time for filing the written statement could not be extended as nothing prevented the appellant from filing the written statement through counsel or in person. He has, thus, failed to give any cogent reason for the de..
The Supreme Court overruled some judgments which did not lay down the law correctly and held that plea of acquisition of title by adverse possession can be taken by plaintiff under Article 65 of the Limitation Act and there is no bar under the Limita..
A foreign Court has jurisdiction to deliver a judgment in rem which may be enforced or recognised in an Indian Court provided that the subject matter of the action is property, whether movable or immovable within the jurisdiction of that Court. The..
The court observed that normally the complainant has the right to choose any court having jurisdiction and the accused cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried...
Supreme Court considered the view that the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts to try the civil Suits with respect to the lands, which were subjected to ceiling proceedings under the Act, are held to be impliedly barred, since the Act excludes the juris..
Under Section 13 of CPC, a foreign judgment is not conclusive as to any matter thereby directly adjudicated upon between the parties if (a) it has not been pronounced by a court of competent jurisdiction; (b) it has not been given on the merits of th..
The Supreme Court held that under Section 9 of the Code, the civil court shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature and one has the right to bring a suit of civil nature of one’s choice however frivolous the claim may be, unless it i..
The Supreme Court is empowered at any stage to transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding from a High Court or other Civil Court in one State to a High Court or other Civil Court of another State if it is satisfied that such an Order is expedien..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. The impugned judgement of the division bench of HC was set aside and the order of the single learned Judge was restored. It was held that the objective of the prohibition in Section 10 is to prevent the courts fr..
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal. The impugned orders were set aside and the statements filed by the defendant were taken off record. It was held that the time period of 120 days is mandatory in nature subsequent to the amendment in Order VIII Ru..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
