Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

M. PIRAVI PERUMAL (Advocate & Consumer Rights)     02 June 2009

YOUR VIEWS PLEASE

Supreme Court pulls up advocates for lacking etiquette

New Delhi (PTI) Advocates, including seniors, appearing in the Supreme Court during the ongoing summer vacation are at the receiving end with the vacation bench frequently pulling them up for their perceived misdemeanours and lack of etiquettes.

Senior counsel Mukul Rohtagi was sternly told by the vacation bench of Justices Markandeya Katju and Deepak Verma that he cannot dictate the court as to what orders it has to pass.

Mr. Rohtagi evoked the court's ire when he insisted that the matter relating to the closure direction issued by the Delhi High Court to private nursing homes "has to be heard" by the apex court for staying the same. 

"You cannot tell us that it has to be heard," Justice Katju retorted, and cautioned the counsel that he cannot quarrel with the bench.

The bench then went on to narrate an anecdote in which a person told his friend about the bravado of his father who fought with a tiger. When the friend asked him as to what happened to his father after the fight, the latter replied that he was gobbled up by the animal!.

"So if you fight with judge you will be gobbled up.

So, don't fight with a judge," the bench told Rohtagi who agreed and said "I humbly request your lordships!"

SO LEARNED FRIENDS THAT DOES MEAN THAT ADVOCATES MUST NOT FIGHT FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE CLIENTS THEY HAVE TO BEG, LICK THE SHOES. . .

YOUR OPINION PLEASE ON THE JUDGEMENT.





Learning

 1 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register