Court is not there to do favor or disfavor. Court is there to implement law. So if a law is biased court can do little. it is only the law making arm( parliament) who can say whether law is right or wrong and correct them if they want.
Your above response shows that you did not even understand the topic the thread poster is trying to raise. You straigntway went to justify the draconian law by saying that court is doing things because woman is suffering -- NO..... COURT IS DOING THINGS BECAUSE THERE IS A LAW LIKE THAT. Courts can just implement law it can not say whether law is just or unjust.
As per your own there are many woman who are still suffering. Even that is out of context - but let me give a reasoning you can understand - - WHAT GOOD IS A LAW IF IT IS NOT ABLE TO STOP WOMEN SUFFERING. or IF IT IS NOT ABLE TO MEET ITS INTENDED PURPOSE ? SO LETS GID RID OF IT.
I know above reasoning is not sound but then necessity of such arguments comes becuase proponents of these legal extortion laws are not ready to accept that people are fed up of these law s because they are being misused and only practical purpose they are serving is enabling extortion. - 95% times these laws are currently being invoked it is for harrashing and extortion.