LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

Whether filing new case against "E" is suggestible or Time b

X had been working in Govt Department on contractual basis for 12 years. The Department advertised 2 posts under Unreserved(UR) category in which X has participated in the selection process in year 2003 and was placed in waitlisted candidate no-2. The waiting list was not displayed by the employer as result X didn’t know about his candidature. The merit list was prepared as

A-UR Position No-1

B-UR Position No-2

C-UR Waiting List No-1

X-UR Waiting List No-2

A& B joined their duties and C was too given appointment against the UR created due to the death of an employee as result X continue to work on contract basis. A left the job after months but X was denied appointment against the vacancy. B remain absent but did not left the job

The employer in year 2005 had advertised one Reserved Post (SC) and the following candidates were placed in the list

D- SC Position No-1

E- SC Waiting List No-1

D was given appointment against the SC post and E was placed as waiting list under SC category

Thereafter, the employer had advertised one Reserved Post (OBC) in year 2006 and

F- OBC- Position No-1 was given appointment

In between B employee was terminated and his Unreserved Post (UR) was given to E Candidate who was placed under Reserved category (SC)

 

X collected the information under RTI and filed the case before CAT IN 2009 against denial of his appointment against the post A under Unreserved category (UR) who left the services after joining. The CAT has directed the employer to consider his case for regular appointment against the post when A resigns. This was challenged before High Court and was remanded back for deciding the plea of Limitation. Later on CAT disposed off as time barred. X is planning to file the writ petition

Therafter, X was discharged from services which was too challenged before the CAT and the Judgment is now reserved

X also wants to challenge the appointment of “E” who was appointed against the Unreserved Post(UR) of B without given any opportunity to X

 

Whether filing petition (O.A) is advisable as the appointment relates to year 2006 and the X came to know only by the submission of the employer in its reply affidavit that UR post of B was offered to E ?

If CAT asks the “X” why you have challenged the procedure in year 2011 what will be his defence?

X don’t have the appointment letter of E, whether he should use RTI for the document or challenge it without any order?

Thanking you,

Sincerely yours

 

 



 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register