Exclusive HOLI Discounts!
Get Courses and Combos at Upto 50% OFF!
Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Ritik Sisodiya   20 October 2019

regards landmark case I.C golakhnath vs state of punjab 1967

If the golakhnath case is to challenge the 17th amendment act then it should be against union of india rather than state of punjab as only parliament have the amendment power under article 368. But the case always refers as golakhnath vs state of punjab. Why so???
Land tenure act of punjab government was already put in IX schedule so it's beyond the judicial review, hence there is no relation of punjab state in such case but we still consider them as a main party! Why so??
Please answer sir!! I'm too confused.


Learning

 0 Replies


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register