Thanks for responding Mehta ji
But my specific queries have remained unanswered. Let me re-write and recast queries with respect to the details of the property already given and the document i.e. original copy of the original lease deed attached therewith;
(a) Whether this property is to considered as self acquired or ancestral as it was allotted against the clams granted for parental property left behind in Pakistan on partition? and now
(b) How (in what proportion) the property should be or will be divided in this case.
In order to answers the above queries it has to be examined as to in what way the Hindu Succession Act 1956 or the Amendment 2005 would be applicable in this case. We would have to adduce the reasons for the same even if it is concluded that the HSA Act 1956 or the Amendment 2005 does not apply here.
Further the (a) above is to be answered based on the basis/facts/background on which this lease hold property was allotted. Once the (a) is decided or concluded then (b) is to be determined as per the provisions contained in the HAS Act 1956 or 2005.
May therefore like to see again please. Thanks.