Possession vs ownership


One piece of land is in our possession since 46 years since 1945 as was gifted verbally to my grandma by her uncle. The same was not registered somehow. We are living in that land.

There was a case in 1960 which was mutually settled out of court in 1970, which shows that land is in our possession .


Suddenly, grandsons of my grandma's uncles comes and says,to vacate the land. What should we do???

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

What is your role in this issues? What is the status of current records? What  is the reason suddenly the Grandson comes in picture?

 
Reply   
 


Lawyer

Consult and engage a local prudent lawyer for appreciation of facts/ documents, professional advise and necessary proceeding.

 
Reply   
 
Retired employee.

Defend your possession through a competent advocate, when the other party drags you to court, till then do not get disturbed.  Moral grounds is left to you.

 
Reply   
 
Practicing Lawyer 9918411669

While raising a query, please specify place of event to give a correct answer. Section 15 of the Indian Easement Act 1882 states that : 

Acquisition by prescripttion.—Where the access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith, as an easement, without interruption, and for twenty years, and where support from one person’s land, or things affixed thereto, has been peaceably received by another person’s land subjected to artificial pressure or by things affixed thereto, as an easement, without interruption, and for twenty years, and where a right of way or any other easement has been peaceably and openly enjoyed by any person claiming title thereto, as an easement, and as of right, without interruption, and for twenty years, the right to such access and use of light or air, support or other easement shall be absolute. Each of the said periods of twenty years shall be taken to be a period ending within two years next before the institution of the suit wherein the claim to which such period relates is contested.

Hope above satisfies your query 

Cheers!

 

 
Reply   
 
ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108

1. Coordinate with a local Property Lawyer, with all available documents for proper guidance & solutions.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal 

VISIT:  www.chshelpforum.com

 

 

 
Reply   
 
Lawyer in Hyderabad.wats app no.9989324294

A rightful owner of an immovable property fails to take action to get back possession within the limitation period 12 years in case of private land 30 years in case of public land)  then his/her rights are lost and person in possession acquires an absolute title, the supreme court ruled out recently , but held that no benefit of adverse possession should be given to people who encroached upon public land. 


Total likes : 2 times

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

Please seek a conference with an Advocate.

 
Reply   
 

Agree with opinion expressed by expert Rama  Chary Rachakonda.

 
Reply   
 
Advocate

It appears that you people are in possession and enjoyment of the said proeprty for more than 12 years which is averse to the so called owners of the property.

In fact they have not taken any steps to oust or vacate you from the property within twelve years of your squatting in the property.

The law on adverse possession is contained in the Indian Limitation Act. Article 65, Schedule I of The Limitation Act prescribes a limitation of 12 years for a suit for possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title. .

Article 64 governs suits for possession based on possessory right.

Limitation Act is one of the important laws which prescribes the limitation period in which the things should have been done

The maxim that law and equality does not help those who sleep over their rights is invoked in support of prescripttion of title by adverse possession. In other words, the original title holder who neglected to enforce his right over the land cannot be permitted to re-enter the land after a long passage of time.

Section 3 of the Limitation Act says that Court will not take cognizance of any suit, which is barred by limitation even if issue of limitation is not taken as a defence. Thus, the law of limitation bars remedy but not the right. But section 27 of Limitation Act is an exception to the general principle of law of limitation and origin of concept of Adverse possession. It reads as, if a person fails to file suit for recovery of possession, within a period of limitation, his right to recover the possession of that property also extinguishes. If such situation occurs, a true owner extinguishes his ownership over the property.

 

Hence you my refuse to vacate the property and file a suit for declaration of title perfecting the las of adverse possession and also for permanent injunction restraining them from interfering in yor possession and enjoyment of the property.  

 

 
Reply   
 

LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query
Muslim Personal Law     |    x