LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

sofia (others)     30 March 2011

Police witness not coming for witness

Hello Experts,

I have one long pending case it is 13 years old case.  now court is hearing witness. the police inspector who is looking this case about 13 years before got transfered to some other place. since last 6 herings he is not coming to court for witness.

he is the last witness.

my lawyer is saying  SI  has to come for witness.

is there any way to solve this.

Your help is highly apriciated.



Learning

 10 Replies

Kiran Kumar (Lawyer)     30 March 2011

you may approach High Court, with an appropriate petition, to get the trial expedited....

 

but it all depends upon the kind of proceedings conducted in your case and the reasons for delay shall not be attributed to you.

prashant pundhir (Criminal Lawyer)     31 March 2011

The enidance of that  police officer is must and compulsary for the case .It is his duty too to come to the court for witness . If he not attending the court,give application to the court concern to issue tne non bailable warrants against that police officer and also to be served through the SSP of your district .

If possible,try to get his posting place and give it to the court and pray to serve the nbw throuh the SSP of that district .

S.B.adil rahman (Legal Consultant )     31 March 2011

Your's is an  interesting case and the delinquency of police officers is rampant in the matter of attending the courts to depose as a witness. I believe that instead of going to the High Court it will be better if you submitted a petition before the trial magistrate requesting him to take cognizance of the matter under section 350 Cr PC. In such a case, if the trial magistrate thinks it fit, he may start the proceeding against him and can impose punishment by levying fine. It is immaterial about the amount of fine which is only hundred rupees. The factor is the punishment imposed to a police officer by the court which is taken very seriously by his superior officers. Moreover, any conviction by a court of law will be a fatal factor for him in consideration of his father promotion or postings. The purpose will also be served because he will have to appear in the court of law.

S.B.adil rahman (Legal Consultant )     31 March 2011

Originally posted by :S.B.adil rahman
"
Your's is an  interesting case and the delinquency of police officers is rampant in the matter of attending the courts to depose as a witness. I believe that instead of going to the High Court it will be better if you submit a petition before the trial magistrate requesting him to take cognizance of the matter under Section 350 Cr PC. In such a case, if the trial magistrate thinks it fit, he may start the proceeding against the delinquent police officer and can impose punishment by levying fine after a summary trial in his own court. Though the amount of fine is only hundred rupees but  the punishment imposed upon  a police officer by the court is taken very seriously by his superior officers. Moreover, any conviction by a court of law will be a fatal factor for him in consideration of his further promotion or postings. The purpose will also be served because he will be compelled to appear in the court of law and to depose in the case. 
"

prashant pundhir (Criminal Lawyer)     31 March 2011

If your purpose is to punish the officer, then go to sec.350 cr.p.c ,but your main case got delayed . Decision is your's .

S.B.adil rahman (Legal Consultant )     31 March 2011

What else can be the cheaper way to compel the attendance of a witness who is a police officer? This way simply a bailable warrant will serve the purpose if the officer is considered as an accused by the court. When he will appear in the court ,the purpose will be served. This is the crude way of bringing a police witness to the dock. The purpose is not punishment but the veiled threat of punishment which will affect his service adversely.

Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Advocacy)     01 April 2011

request from court for notice u/s-350 .

for that officer!

Anmol Sharma (advocate)     01 April 2011

it may be fatal for the prosecution and not for you... please you need to consult a lawyer.. as manyy documents are to be proved by IO.

anil kumar (law student, ex IPS)     21 April 2011

Very mature and correct answer

S.B.adil rahman (Legal Consultant )     21 April 2011

The case has ended in chargesheet. Trial has started on the strength of documents which had been relied upon by the I.O resulting in charge sheet. The documents which have been relied upon by the prosecution have been supplied to the accused person before commencement of the trial. Now tell me what more documents can be proved by the IO when he is not coming. It will never be proved for another 13 years by this method. Only tarikh per tarikh to harass the accused? If the summons to the IO does not work then the prosecution/ defence can ask the court to issue warrant of arrest against the IO to compel his attendance before the court, but when it has not been  done then something is fishy. Courts have ample powers to take action against the errant IO by starting the prosecution of the IO under CRPC. If for the fault of the prosecution the case drowns then let it drown. As because a person is acused, he can not be subjected to harassment by the law merely on the conjectures  that the State is a previleged litigant. But is it so? Constitution of India is more super to the law. The right to life of the accused is being affected adversely.The defence advocate is not initiating a suitable step for his client. He has perhaps found an ATM in his client. Circumstances can lead to such inference other wise why a case will linger for 13 years, albeit, had he taken the appropriate steps in the interest of his client and justice.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register