The Nagaland Retirement from Public Employment (Second Amendment) Act 2009, passed by the nagaland legislative Assembly under Artyicle 246 read with List II of entry 41 which has lead to so much litigation culminating in SLP in the Supreme Court. The main issue is section 3 clause 1 which says: a person in public employment shall hold office for a term of 35 years from the date of joining employment or until he attains th age of 60 years. Some employees are aggrieved by the said act as according to them the determaining factors should be either 60 years or only the length of service as 35 years and not both. Although the matter is now pending in the Supreme Court, I would apperciate if LCI Members can give views and opinions in this matters. Is the Act of the Nagaland Legislative Assembly unreasonable or Reasonable?
