Upgrad LLM

jurisdiction of tribunal under section 254 of it act, 1961

Corporate Laws and Indirect Taxation Laws Practitioner.

 The issue decided on merit after appreciation of the facts of the case cannot be construed as suffering from patent, self-evident, glaring and mistake apparent from the record as contemplated under section 254(2) - Essel Propak Ltd. v. ACIT [M. A. 24/Mum/09]

 
Reply   
 
Chartered accountant

But if the law is erroneously applied and there is also a decision to the contrary of the jurisdictional High court or Supreme court then the error can be rectified.

 
Reply   
 


LEAVE A REPLY


    

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  



 

  Search Forum








×

Menu

CrPC MASTERCLASS!     |    x