LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Guest (Guest)     24 July 2009

Jurisdiction of Tribunal under section 254 of IT Act, 1961

 The issue decided on merit after appreciation of the facts of the case cannot be construed as suffering from patent, self-evident, glaring and mistake apparent from the record as contemplated under section 254(2) - Essel Propak Ltd. v. ACIT [M. A. 24/Mum/09]



 1 Replies

Sivadas Chettur (Chartered accountant)     24 September 2009

But if the law is erroneously applied and there is also a decision to the contrary of the jurisdictional High court or Supreme court then the error can be rectified.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register