The Presiding Officer granted time to the Deft. to make payment to Bank by giving proposal to the Bank for out-of-court-sale of his property and bounded the Bank to reply within 60 days.
Accordingly the Defendant gave proposal and informed the Court by filling affidavit and attached Bank’ acknowledgement. Hence the R.O.(Recovery Officer) stayed Recovery proceedings for 60 days.
The Advocate of the Bank was not present at that time and dramatically he came in 2nd session at 2.30 pm and declared that the Deft. has not given any proposal and on his such statement (without hearing to the concerned Deft.) the said R. O. preponed the Date from 60 days to next seven days only.
On such new date the Defendant showed original acknowledgement of the Bank then the Advocate of the Bank confessed that he did not knew about the same because the Bank did not inform him and then again the R.O. has stayed Recovery proceedings for further 60 days.
What actions on the said Advocate and/or R.O. can be taken in law.