whether a conviction should be set aside based on irregularity if judge record evidence in his judgment which no where exist , judge says so and so witness says such and such thing(important thing, basis for conviction not sole but say 40 %) but actually that was judge mistake and on record available in file witness never said such things.
can in appeal defence take this ground to say trial is null and void / not curable/prejudiced accused so conviction should be setaside as per crpc 465
