LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     01 September 2012

How to address a judge?

If we meet a Supreme Court or High Court Judge outside the Court for example in a conference,seminar, judicial meeting etc; how do we address him or her? My Lord? Your Honor? or simply as Judge?



 9 Replies

Guest (Guest)     01 September 2012

The colonial phrases 'My Lord' and 'Your Lordship'  are no longer required to be chanted while addressing the SC and HC judges in the courtroom. As pithily put by Justice YK Sabharwal, "The Lord is only one and he is God, above all of us. I am not God. Judges are not Gods”. It belies rationality to address them outside court as 'My Lord' and 'Your Lordship' when it is not required to be done inside the courtroom. Address them as 'Your Honour' or 'Sir'.

2 Like

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     01 September 2012

Adish, I dont even prefer using Your Honor as it sounds too bombastic? I would prefer using simple word Judge, is it proper?

1 Like

Guest (Guest)     01 September 2012

In my view, it is just and proper to address him outside the court as 'judge', or by his name as is the practice is all the major democracies. No judge would find it unacceptable, unless the unacceptability stimulates from an overzealous adherence to the colonial practice of equating the judges with gods.

2 Like

Democratic Indian (n/a)     01 September 2012

Addressing a judge as simply Sir or Mr. Justice XYZ should be sufficient.
1 Like

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     01 September 2012

Ashish, Haaaaaaaaaaaa equating the judges with God. I agree with justice YK. Subarmaniam. And why dont we do away with that black robe, the mark of a colonial stamp that exist till today?

1 Like

b man (Namaste)     02 September 2012

 

Dear Assumiji,
 
 
I endorse your view that we should discard the colonial black robes. We can have our own dress code, which reflects INDIAN culture.
 
 
In fact in 2010, Union Minister Jairam Ramesh while attending the convocation of the Indian Institute of Forest Management in Bhopal had also refused to wear the convocation gown.
 
 
Jairam Ramesh had said "I still have not been able to figure out after more than six decades of India's independence that why we stick to these barbaric colonial relics,"
 
 
Warm regards

Guest (Guest)     02 September 2012

There is a difference between the robes which are worn at convocations and the ones which are worn by the judges of the superior courts. Judicial robes reflects a distinct, honourable and unparallel position which a judge occupies in the constitutional set up of the country. It demonstrates the unmatched authority which is exercised by a judge of the constitional court. It ought not to be discarded in my view. 

1 Like

ramani (Director)     02 September 2012

I agree with Ashishji. Apart fm what Ashishji has staed, I bellieve there is a certain sanctity and decorum the robe provides in a Court . We say " respect is to be commanded not demanded" The robe enhances the Command value to the Judge.

b man (Namaste)     03 September 2012

 

Dear Ashishji,
 

I was not referring to the JUDGES’s robes.
 
I had the LAWYERS in my mind when made the comments. The black coat/gown they wear.

Fully agree with your comments with regards to the JUDGES’s robes.
 
Warm regards

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register