LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sukhwinder Singh (Asst. Professor)     25 October 2015

Compromise u/s 420

Accused - X (Present in court) Y & Z ( P O) Complainants - A, B, C, D, E CASE STATUS - A & B came to record their statements for prosecution evidence. C & D never came despite of several summons. E Took his complaint back at the starting of investigation by Police Accused X convicted with R.I of 3 years u/s 420 Appeal pending before sessions judge. A, B & X are interested for compromise. Query - Is compromise between A, B & X permissible? What are the chances of FIR quashing in High Court? Can D & E come up again in Sessions Court and demand for compromise money?


 2 Replies

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     25 October 2015

pleease state facts clearly

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     25 October 2015

repeat https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Compromise-u-s-420-567351.asp

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register