On this forum, various learned lawyers have commented that 138 cases can be won on many technical points.
What if an accused is served summons under her maiden name, because that is how she had signed the cheques, but she has been married for many years and officially her name has changed long time back.
I am curious as to why the complainant did not file and serve summons under her married name, although he is very well aware of this - by his own admission in the summons. Why has he used her maiden name in court papers and what advantage does it buy the accused.
In any case, the entire case has been fabricated by the accused, and he will also lose hands down because of that, but I am also curious about this technical point.