Cheque bounce case between brother and sister

I have already informed  " Your brother has to prove that you had issued him the cheque towards your dischargeable liability.". Loan is a dischargeable liability which your brother has to prove.

The Complainant can file anything he likes but without any proof his complaints will not be accepted. 

Dear Mr. Ganguly,

By accepted you mean that the case will not be tried? Because, the case has already been successfully filed, without presenting any evidence of loan.

its money... not rocket science...

she wants to grab under garb of gift...

he wants to fix her under loan liability...

1. Date of cheque.

2. Date of notice.

3. Date of your reply.

4. Date of filing comjplaint,l if any.

5. Did your brother ever give you money by cheque?

no money was ever given.  the dates are all correct, beacuse the case has been filed.

Brother wants the sister to get convicted and go to jail !!

Sounds quite unbrotherly !!!  something more than what is just stated.. 

Not accepted means it will not be accepted by Law. Your brother may file the case but will not be able to prove before the Court that the cheque was issued against any of your dischargeable liabilities on him. Hence, the case will be didmissed. Contact a good lawyer to contest the case.

u had not recd notice yet. 

u r ready to pay ur brother, as  cheque bounced as u did not arrange and mis calculation. 

Under the circumstances, the moment you receive notice, you can pay by DD/ Pay Order the amt of cheque and the matter is over. 

"""You says now ""My brother has not given me any money"""

Earier you said **"My brother has given me cash, in the past, for more than one lakh and some gifts in the form of cheques also."""

You do not contradict your own statements. 

In fact you have no problem : No notice/ no court case/ Gift or Loan, cheque is issued by you. 

dear member

there has to be a definite liability to win a conviction under sec 138. see if there is any thing written between you and your brother about any dealings.

if there is none, then you are on a strong ground. in my view, a cheque issued as a gift, does not come within the ambit of section 138.

thanks

yours

v.lakshminarayanan

palani