Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

LAWYERS NOT ALLOWED IN FAMILY COURT CHENNAI

Page no : 4

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     16 November 2010

exploitation of people by any professional/anybody is not justified. Why only blame lawyers. It is the pressure of lawyers that judges are in control or they too would have behaved like executives.

Avnish Kaur (Consultant)     16 November 2010

sir, u forgot to mention desi lawyer gandhiji?

Bhartiya No. 1 (Nationalist)     16 November 2010

Thanks Avnishji, for reminding me about Gandhiji, he is most Important figure till today.  By the way he too is included in "all the first line freedom fighters"

Even Gandhiji came to know how to present truth to society or to a court, when he became advocate. Truth must be presented in a way so that other can believe the version.


(Guest)

 

 

Originally posted by :Ram Samudre-DRF KABEERPANTHI
"



Originally posted by :Avnish Kaur



"


The Principal Judge of Chennai-Family Court has sent out this circular to strictly follow sec 13 of the Family Courts Act. This means lawyers are kept at abeyance and cannot walk in and represent clients.

"




 

At a glance it is a VERY GOOD NEWS. The justice system should be as simple so there should be no need of professional lawyer / advocate.  In this process to make the justice system free from professional advocacy those lawyers/advocates may opt other business like PAN-SHOP, KIRANA STORE, GENERAL STORE AND and many other jobs which people do and those who have no other option for any reason they may get guaranteed employment in NAREGA too.

 

BUT JUSTICE SHOULD BE AS SIMPLE AS NATURAL FOR ALL IRRESPECTIVE OF RICH OR POOR.
"

 

Here is the topic of this thread regarding general transaction in people & advocates and neither it is related with Lincon, Obama & Gandhiji nor every advocate is like them.

First, this profession originates with a negative source and that is critical justice system is made so no survive without hiring the advocate and poor people are not treated as human being.  

 

IT IS AN INJUSTICE SYSTEM OF INDIA AND IT IS INDIAN JUDICIARY WHICH IS GIVES JUSTICE (MONEY) TO JUDGES AND LAWYERS FROM AND NO ENTRY FOR 47 CRORE POOR PEOPLE OF INDIA.  YES THE POOR PEOPLE GET POOR ADVOCACY FROM GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ADVOCATES WHO TAKES ASSURED MONEY FROM GOVERNMENT BUT NO ATTENTION TO WIN THE CASE DUE TO NO ATTRACTION OF UNJUSTIFIED FEES FROM PEOPLE.

 


(Guest)
Originally posted by :swatirswatir
"
mr ram samudre ji .your views are just too revolutionary.
"

 

Thank you dear. I believe to do right things AT ANY COST and if law need to be changed its just OK. 


(Guest)

Mr. Manjit.

My article under head ," Representation of Party by Legal practitioner in Family Court" is posted on 10 November 2010 and is available at page 02 of ARTICLE SECTION.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register