LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


In my view Ignorance of law MUST BE AN EXCUSE in civil matters for the following reasons.

 

  1. There are almost 1,000 Acts, or even more, in our country, including Central, State and delegated legislation by local authorities.
  2. It is my humble challenge that even the names of all the Acts can not be reproduced by any qualified Advocate, leave alone thoroughly understanding them.
  3. It is IMPOSSIBLE and, therefore, highly unreasonable to expect a layman to know every law applicable to him.
  4. Section 56 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 provides that "An agreement to do an act IMPOSSIBLE in itself is void".
  5. On the same analogy it can be stated that "An obligation to do an act IMPOSSIBLE in itself is void ab initio."
  6. Accordingly, in today's circumstances the trite legal Doctrine "Ignorance of law IS NO EXCUSE" is against all canons of justice, hence must be held as outdated.
  7. In S. Nagaraj vs State of Karnataka {1993 Suppl (4) SCC 595 (Pp. 619-para 19)} hon'ble Supreme Court has stated “Justice is a virtue which transcends all barriers. Neither the rules of procedure nor technicalities of law can stand in its way… Even the law bends before justice….If the Court finds that the order was passed under a mistake and it would not have exercised the jurisdiction but for the erroneous assumption which in fact did not exist and its perpetration shall result in miscarriage of justice then it can not on any principle be precluded from rectifying the error. Mistake is accepted as valid reason to recall an order… But the root from which the power flows is the anxiety to avoid injustice …. If the Court is satisfied of the injustice then it is its constitutional and legal obligation to set it right by recalling its order.” 
  8. Therefore, in my view "Ignorance of law MUST BE AN EXCUSE in civil matters", and the modus operandi may be developed as per the circumstances of each case.
  9. Further, in my view "Ignorance of law MUST BE made a ground for compounding an offence in deserving financial / criminal offences", however, the modus operandi may be developed as per the circumstances of each case.

Note: the views expressed are my personal and a view point only.

LCI Learning

 

Author:

Narendra Sharma, Consultant (Legal)

E-mail: nkdewas@yahoo.co.in

 


"Loved reading this piece by Narendra Sharma?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"






Tags :


Category Constitutional Law, Other Articles by - Narendra Sharma 



Comments

14 years ago Narendra Sharma

DEAR Mr. shashank anand-Thank you for the kind words. As desired, kindly refer the latest post in my BLOG on the subject.Regards-N.K.SHARMA


14 years ago shashank anand

This is called 'out of box thinking'. though, this view if set as principle may provide hide out for most of the law offender. A great approach to think differently instead of being conventional follower. Please add more value to this article by putting more logic to it.


14 years ago Narendra Sharma

Yes, to some extent. The LEGISLATURE HAS SINCE LONG EXPRESSLY ACCEPTED THIS APPROACH and has enacted relevant provisions. Please refer PROVISO to Section 217(5) and 217(6) of the Companies Act, 1956.


14 years ago DR.SANAT KUMAR DASH

IGNORANCE OF LAW IS NO EXCUSE


14 years ago Narendra Sharma

Yes. Please refer the Nagpur HC judgment vide citation AIR 1928 Nag 188. Kindly also make further research on the subject. Please refer Linkedin.com for DETAILED DISCUSSION on this topic.Regards


14 years ago Out of Court

can i avail the benefit of ignorance of law may be an excuse as per facts nd circumstances stated as aforesaid ?


14 years ago Out of Court

could nt understood the meaning of the same nd even bothered to visit any lawyer due to unawareness, eventually complaint u/s 138 proceeded against me ... continued...


14 years ago Out of Court

138 NI Act is out of my imagination ambit, while discharging my agricultural liabilities i issued a cheque bearing 50 000/- , got dishonored, legal notice served to me, ...continued...


14 years ago Out of Court

I am a layman, uses authority thru thumb impressions in every document, i opened a account in State Bank of India, got cheque books issued, have little knowledge about to issue cheques but ...continued


14 years ago Narendra Sharma

Nag HC: so that to presume that everybody knows the law is to accept as true what is known to be untrue. A great deal beyond anything in the Evidence Act. .... that it is every man's business to know the law and to keep inside it..


Show All (31) (Login required)


You are not logged in . Please login to post comments.

Click here to Login / Register