Departmental enquiry and session Court order
JAGATSINGH
(Querist) 10 April 2017
This query is : Resolved
The lokayukta makes the department mental enquiry and makes opposite decision of district session Court. And gives compulsory retirement recommendation to govt. And govt released shokas notice to me to give answer in writing and asked my date of retairment, sir I am shocked today how is possible the district session Court I win the case. The court decided iam not involving in corrption, Sir plse help what can I do next? Plse help
Guest
(Expert) 10 April 2017
Both the cases are required to be examined appropriately before arriving at any opinion or guidance.
N.K.Assumi
(Expert) 10 April 2017
What was the case in Session Court? Criminal case and Departmental proceedings are different, though usually departmental proceedings are terminated if the delinquent is acquitted by criminal court, but the rule is not absolute, and delinquent can be proceeded against even after acquittal by criminal court.
N.K.Assumi
(Expert) 10 April 2017
In case the departmental proceedings culminated in departmental actions against you, by way of compulsory retirement etc, you can appeal to the appointing authority.
JAGATSINGH
(Querist) 10 April 2017
NK Assami sir, this case about corruption, the lokayukta police Karnataka was arrested me in false corruption case. And produce at district season court. And departmental Enquiry held in their hands means at lokayukta department but I am belongs to revenue department. In this case the district session Court I win the case the court decided iam not involving in corruption hence I win but the departmental Enquiry and decided iam corrupted and recommended to my revenue department to give the compulsory retirement to me. Iam shocked in one case there are two judgment how it is possible ? Sir plse help me
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 11 April 2017
repeated
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Govt-Duty--637696.asp
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 11 April 2017
repeated query.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 11 April 2017
It shall be appropriate to consult a very able counsel specializing in service matters with all record and contest on merits.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 11 April 2017
I am sending few links to you.
You may go thru.
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 21 June 2018
I agree with AK Assumi's opinion.
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
Is there any logic, purpose or special reason for agreeing again 2nd time with an expert after clear 14 months when you agreed first time with the expert?
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
Is there any logic, purpose or special reason for agreeing again 2nd time with an expert after clear 14 months when you agreed first time with the expert?
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
Is there any logic, purpose or special reason for agreeing again 2nd time with an expert after clear 14 months when you agreed first time with the expert?
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
Is there any logic, purpose or special reason for agreeing again 2nd time with an expert after clear 14 months when you agreed first time with the expert?
