Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Judgement for dv act(sejal dharmesh ved vs state of maharashtra)

(Querist) 18 August 2014 This query is : Resolved 
Unable to find the Judgement for Sejal Dharmesh Ved Vs State of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Sejal Dharmesh Ved
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2011

Could you pls share the Link where the Judgement is available
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 18 August 2014
sorry. judgments are not supplied here.
Make your own effort.
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 18 August 2014
The information you provided is wrong also.

Go to Bombay High Court and check the site. You would understand that you are misinformed.
V R SHROFF (Expert) 18 August 2014
Advocate SHANMUGA SUNDARAM;
We do not provide Citations or judgements here.
You have to do your legwork yourself.
R.K Nanda (Expert) 18 August 2014
search google.
ajay sethi (Expert) 18 August 2014
visit bombay high court website . type in the details under name of parties . you will get the judgement
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 18 August 2014
Judgment or citation not provided in the section.
Anirudh (Expert) 18 August 2014
The following is the copy of the judgment.

(4) APL 160/11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2011
Sejal Dharmesh Ved .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Amit S. Dhutia i/b Niranjan Mundargi for the Applicant.
Mrs. A. A. Mane, APP for Respondent No.1¬State.

CORAM: MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J.
DATE: 7th MARCH, 2013.
P.C.
1. The applicant¬wife has challenged the order of the Court of Sessions at Greater Bombay dated 27.10.2010 holding that her application under the Prevention of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V Act) is not maintainable because she was not in any domestic relationship.

2. The applicant married on 04.05.1999. She lived with her husband in the US. There are two issues from the marriage. She returned to India on 11.02.2009.

3. She filed her application under the D.V Act on 18.01.2010.

4. The learned Judge has considered that under these circumstances, she having come to India in February, 2009 and having filed this application in January, 2010, there was no domestic relationship between the parties. The learned Judge has considered the definition of domestic relationship. Of course, that relationship is defined to be one of which the party then lived and had earlier lived. That would be during the subsistence of the union between them. The application under the D. V. Act could be filed, when the marriage union subsisted. That having came to an an end and long after the physical relationship came to be an end, she having returned to India, she cannot be taken to be living in any domestic relationship in India.

5. A wife who lived in a domestic relationship earlier, but which ceases only because of any domestic violence can certainly file an application for such domestic violence that took place whilst she lived in that relationship.
Such application is required to be filed within a reasonable timeto show that relationship would give her the cause of action to sue under the D.V. Act for the reliefs under the Act.

6. A wife who has returned from the USA and consequently from the domestic relationship and lived in India for one year cannot file an application with regard to that relationship after such time. Such wife cannot be taken to be in any domestic relationship. The order of the learned Judge is, therefore,
correct. The writ petition is completely devoid of merits and accordingly dismissed.
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)

Dr R SHANMUGA SUNDARAMM (Querist) 18 August 2014
i have searched in the Bombay high court website

http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/ord_qrywebcase.php

but unable to get the judgement, i'm getting the different judgement. Could you pls help me
Shonee Kapoor (Expert) 21 August 2014
The citation no. is 2014ALLMR(Cri)636

Any lawyer can get the same in any district court in Maharashtra, district bars would be having this journal.




Regards,

Shonee Kapoor
www.shoneekapoor.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/shoneekapoor
twitter.com/shoneekapoor
Yahoogroups: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sahodar

If you don't fight for what you want, don't cry for what you LOST.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :