others

Key Takeaways Under Section 18(A) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 a court may pass an order to conduct the trial of a child as an adult. This decision is to be taken after conducting a preliminary assessment under section 15 of the Act. The question that arises is whether &lsq..

Key Takeaways Res Judicata to be applicable only in case of conclusive judgments given by the courts. A suit under Section 92 shall be considered as a representative suit and therefore, shall be binding on all the parties interested in the issue. h2 style="text-a..

SC Upholds Rejection Of Candidature To Judicial Post Citing Absence Of Honourable Acquittal In Criminal Case It was observed by the court that a common man's perception about credentials of judicial officer is vital and the lack of honourable acquittal will undermine public faith. The case was of Rajasthan High Court v. A..

Case title DLF Home Developers Limited vs. Rajapura Homes Private Limited Key Takeaways The case was heard by the bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant. Two separate arbitr..

Complaint in case of a judge cannot be about a poor judgment or order.For that, there is a facility of correction, analysis, or appeal to the higher Judiciary. So, in what circumstances can people complain against judges? Plausible bad or irresponsible behaviour of judge include being impolite to other people or having bad body language, actions or behaviour towards..

Section 92 CPC- Judgment In Representative Suit Binds All Parties Interested In The Trust: SC The case was of Jamia Masjid v. K V Rudrappa. The decision was given by Justices DY Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli. It has been held by the Court that a suit under Section 92 CPC is of a representative character and all pers..

In a magnanimous gesture, the Kerala High Court has as recently as on August 27, 2021 in a learned, laudable, landmark and latest judgment titled Radhakrishna Pillai v. District Level Authorization Committee for transplantation of Human Organs, Ernakulam) in WP(C) No. 16216 OF 2021 has spared no words to make it abundantly clear that criminal antecedents of a person..

Definitions of Tort Introduction Law is generally divided into public and private laws. While public laws regulate the conduct of states, private laws aim at regulating the behavior of individuals. Sir Pit Cobbet said, “Private law is the body of rules for determining questions a..

NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name Siddaraju v. the State of Karnataka, Case Number: MA No.2171/2020 in CA No.1567/2017 Coram: Justice Nageswara Rao, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. Gavai p style="text-align: justify;..

Name of the Case Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka Key Takeaways The decision of the Karnataka High Court to drop charges against one of the accused in a murder case was challenged by the petitioners. li style="text-align: just..

Name of the Case Rajendra Bajoria v. Hemant Kumar Jalan Key Takeaways A partnership firm was still running even after the death of the three founding partners and relief was sought from the firm. The..

Key Takeaways Vinod Kumar and Manikantan were convicted for their roles in the Kalluvathukkal Hooch Tragedy of 2000, which claimed over 30 lives. The Court denied the convicts' appeals in 2011. Their wives asked the Supreme Court to let them out before July. The Supreme Cour..

Key Takeaways High Court granted bail to an accused as he was not in possession of contraband on his person when searched by the authorities. The Supreme court saw that the High Court has overlooked certain elements of the case when granting bail, and failed to give enough impor..

Case title Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited Vs. T.P. Natarajan Key Takeaways This case was heard by the Bench of Justice MR Shah and Justice AS Bopanna. Shri Gurudas S. Kannur, lear..

Key Takeaways The petitioner claimed himself to be a permissible tenant of a temple’s property, belonging to the Respondents and wanted to get it transferred to his name. However, the Respondents passed an order of eviction which was challenged before the Madras High Court..