others

NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name Siddaraju v. the State of Karnataka, Case Number: MA No.2171/2020 in CA No.1567/2017 Coram: Justice Nageswara Rao, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. Gavai p style="text-align: justify;..

Name of the Case Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka Key Takeaways The decision of the Karnataka High Court to drop charges against one of the accused in a murder case was challenged by the petitioners. li style="text-align: just..

Name of the Case Rajendra Bajoria v. Hemant Kumar Jalan Key Takeaways A partnership firm was still running even after the death of the three founding partners and relief was sought from the firm. The..

Key Takeaways Vinod Kumar and Manikantan were convicted for their roles in the Kalluvathukkal Hooch Tragedy of 2000, which claimed over 30 lives. The Court denied the convicts' appeals in 2011. Their wives asked the Supreme Court to let them out before July. The Supreme Cour..

Key Takeaways High Court granted bail to an accused as he was not in possession of contraband on his person when searched by the authorities. The Supreme court saw that the High Court has overlooked certain elements of the case when granting bail, and failed to give enough impor..

Case title Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited Vs. T.P. Natarajan Key Takeaways This case was heard by the Bench of Justice MR Shah and Justice AS Bopanna. Shri Gurudas S. Kannur, lear..

Key Takeaways The petitioner claimed himself to be a permissible tenant of a temple’s property, belonging to the Respondents and wanted to get it transferred to his name. However, the Respondents passed an order of eviction which was challenged before the Madras High Court..

Arbitration Reference Can Be Declined If Dispute In Question Does Not Correlate To Arbitration Agreement The case was of DLF Home Developers Limited v. Rajapura Homes Private Limited. The decision was given by CJI NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant. It was held by this bench that reference to arbitration under Section 11 of the..

In a big slap on the face of all such sexual predators who as employers stoop to such a low level that they obtain the consent for sexual act from a woman employee by making false promise of reemployment, the Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court in a learned, laudable, landmark and latest judgment titled Rajkishore Shrivastava vs. State of MP and another in M...

The Supreme Court has, in the judgment of the case- Sau. Sangeeta Sunil Shinde v. State of Maharashtra and others, delivered on September 1, 2021, ruled in most clear terms that in a democratic set up, the will of the majority has to prevail. A division bench of the SC consisting of Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice Bhushan R. Gavai has referred to the provisions..

SC Reserves Judgement On Sister's Plea Challenging Quashing Of KCOCA Charges Against Accused In Gauri Lankesh Murder Case The case was about Gauri Lankesh, who was shot dead in Bengaluru in 2017. A plea had been filed by her sister, KavitaLankesh, challenging the Karnataka High Court judgement which quashed charges under ..

Key Takeaways ● The Indian judiciary is the most important organ of the country that acts as the guardian of safeguarding the rights of the citizens. ● However, the environment of our judiciary is not effective enough to serve its purposes. A number of challenges threaten the co..

KEY TAKEAWAY A caretaker/servant cannot acquire an interest in a property regardless of its long possession. The caretaker or agent holds the property of the principal on behalf of the owner. He does not have any right or interest in the same property. CASE BACKGROUND This case was initiated by the plaintiff, MD Zahid, respondent in the present ..

Case title Dr Prateek Rastogi & Ors v National Board of Examination and Ors Key Takeaways This case was heard by Justices DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna. The learned coun..

Key Takeaways Accused convicted under Section 326 of IPC for causing grievous hurt. Supreme Court said that when giving punishment, the aggravating and mitigating factors of the crime have to be considered. Court cannot ignore brutality ev..