others

The Karnataka HC has recently refused to quash a DNA report which proved him to be the biological father of a child born to a victim of rape. In the instant case titled Malappa vs State of Karnataka, a complaint was filed by the victim in 2016, and the police registered a case against the petitioner under 376, 504, 506..

The Telangana HC has recently held in the case of Kodam Danalakshmi vs. State of Telangana that a joint account holder who is not a signatory to a disputed cheque will not be liable to be prosecuted under Section 138 NI Act. In the instant case, the petitioner moved the HC under section 482 CrPC to quash the criminal p..

The Kerala HC has recently held in the case of K.S.Narayana Elayathu vs. Sandhya that the District Court can only appoint a guardian for a minor’s property, and the right to appoint a guardian for the minor’s person only rests with the Family Court under Section 7(1)(g) of the Family Court’s Act. In t..

DNA Test Can Be Ordered In Deserving Cases, Not A Violation Of Article 20(3): Karnataka HC The Karnataka HC has recently refused to quash a DNA report which proved him to be the biological father of a child born to a victim of rape. In the instant case titled Malappa vs State of..

KEY TAKEAWAYS The scope of disciplinary processes and the scope of criminal proceedings are completely different, exclusive, and independent. An acquittal in a criminal trial has no influence or relevance on disciplinary proceedings, according to the fundamental principle of law..

Click here for Part 2 21. Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal v. Union of India: Disciplinary proceedings against person with mental disability is a face..

In a recent case titled Rakesh Kumar vs. Vijayanta arya (DCP) and Ors. the Hon’ble Delhi HC has sentenced a police officer to undergo one day simple imprisonment and to pay a cost of Rs.15,000 to the petitioner for arresting him in violation of the guidelines issued in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2014)SC. Ta..

CCTV Installation In Spas And The Right To Relax: Know What The Madras HC Has To Say The Madras HC has overruled a single-bench decision given in C.P.Girija vs. Superintendent of Police and Ors. and has stated that installation of CCTV cameras in the private spaces inside the massage parlour would necessarily infringe..

The Madras HC has overruled a single-bench decision given in C.P.Girija vs. Superintendent of Police and Ors. and has stated that installation of CCTV cameras in the private spaces inside the massage parlour would necessarily infringe upon a person’s right to privacy and bodily autonomy. In the instant case title..

In a case titled Parvaiz Ahmed vs. Fida Mohammad Ayoub the Hon’ble J&K&L HC has held that the dishonour of a cheque due to an incomplete signature would be an offence constituted under Section 138 of the NI Act. The instant plea was filed by Parvaiz Ahmed and another, challenging the complaint under 138 N..

Criminal Trial And Disciplinary Proceedings- Acquittal In Former Has No Effect On The Latter In the case of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Dilip Uttam Jayabhay, the Hon’ble SC has set aside the order of the Industrial Court which directed the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation to re-e..

The Hon’ble SC in the case titled Union of India vs. Manju Arora has held that any Central Government employee who has refused the offer of promotion will not be entitled to the financial upgradation under the O.M. dated 9/8/1999. An Assured Career Progression Scheme was launched under the O.M. dated 9/8/1999 by ..

Key takeaways In July 2021, a consortium of 17 journalistic organizations including one Indian organization, released in public the results of an investigative effort indicating the use of the Pegasus spyware on several individuals around the world including 300 Indians. The spy..

Click here For Part 1 11. a href="https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/judiciary/dr-jaishri-laxmanrao-patil-vs-the-chief-minister-ors-marath..

A bench of the Hon’ble SC has held that an application filed under section 34(4) of the Arbitration Act does not mandate the Court to refer the matter to the Arbitration Tribunal as the same is within the discretion of the Court. As per section 34(4) of the aforementioned Act, the court may, at the request of any..