LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

CASE PERCEPTIONS

  • The Supreme Court remarked while amending a former 'wrong' order it had passed in a transfer petition that the family court could not deal with a criminal complaint for various offences under the Indian Penal Code.
  • The Court had recently permitted a transfer petition 'as prayed for'. However, the said application looked to move a criminal case enrolled under different provisions of the Indian Penal Code from the Judicial Magistrate Court Thane, Maharashtra to other such courts
  • The Family Judge, Vadodara, Gujarat, on getting the documents, composed a letter to the Supreme Court Registry and carried this error to its notification. Hence, the matter was again positioned under the steady gaze of the Court as a 'Miscellaneous Application'.

CASE RELEVANCES

  • The Court then, at that point altered the previous request with a bearing to move the criminal procedures to a competent court in Vadodara, Gujarat as coordinated by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Vadodara.
  • In the event that the Family Court, Vadodara has effectively received the document of the moved case, the same will be shipped off to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for assignment to a competent court.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS CASE?

"Loved reading this piece by Tisya Mishra?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  129  Report



Comments