LIVE Online Course on NDPS by Riva Pocha and Adv. Taraq Sayed. Starting from 24th May. Register Now!!
LAW Courses

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


  • The Supreme Court emphasized that the Section 202(2) CrPC is unimportant to protests under Section 138 in regard to the assessment of observers on pledge.


  • Name of the case : Sunil Todi vs State of Gujarat
  • The Court saw that the proof of observers for the benefit of the complainant will be allowed on oath.
  • One of the issues raised by the accused was whether the Magistrate, taking into account Section 202 CrPC, should have delayed the issuance of the cycle?
  • The accused had argued that Section 202 CrPC visualizes the delay of the issuance of interaction where the accused dwells past the ward for the domain of the court.
  • For this case, no request was completed by the Magistrate.
  • The order passed by the Magistrate can't be held to be invalid as selling out a non-use of psyche, the court stated.


  • Do you agree with the decision of the Supreme Court ?
  • What is section 138 NI Act ?
"Loved reading this piece by Yogeshwari Sirsikar?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"

Tags :

  Views  109  Report

Post a Suggestion for LCI Team
Post a Legal Query