Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Quick Summary
The Madras High Court has granted conditional bail to former AIADMK minister M. Manikandan, who is facing charges including rape. The case was filed by a Malaysian woman with whom he had a live-in relationship for five years. The court noted that the complainant was aware of his marital status and that evidence for forced abortions was not presented. The court also observed that the continuation of the relationship and sexual relations were consensual.

Who are the Parties to the case

  • The case is Dr. M. Manikandan v. State.
  • The petitioner is M. Manikandan.
  • He is a former minister of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK).
  • The complainant is a Malaysian citizen.
  • She worked with the Malaysian Tourism Department and Corporation.
  • She also has been a part of the Tamil and Malayalam movie industries.

Factual Background

  • The complainant and the petitioner had come in contact during the work of the complainant.
  • The petitioner had showed his interest in starting a business in Malaysia and later they started living in a live-in relationship.
  • They lived together for 5 years and the complainant has alleged that despite promises of marriage, he did not marry her and she was subjected to physical harassment.
  • She has also claimed the petitioner to have forced her to undergo abortions numerous times over the years.
  • The petitioner was charged under Sections 417, 376, 313, 323 and 506 (i) of IPC and 67-A of IT Act.

Court’s Observation

  • The complainant was not uniformed of the petitioner being married and with children.
  • Evidences to prove forced abortions were not presented.
  • The relationship was voluntarily entered into by the complainant and the continuation was consensual as the petitioner had lost his ministership.
  • The sexual relationships were also voluntary and she was intelligent enough to understand the objections that they would have faced for marriage from the family of the accused.
  • The petitioner was released on a bail for a bond of Rs. 10,000 and other conditions laid by the Court.

Do you think the case would fall under rape case? Tell us in the comments below!

"Loved reading this piece by SUSHREE SAHU?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"




Tags :

  Views  93  Report



Comments