NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM NAME: High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan versus The State of Rajasthan and Another CORAM: Justices L Nageswara Rao and Aniruddha Bose CITATION: LL 2021 SC 523KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court’s ruling came in the ma ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS If there is a fundamental infringement of the policy's terms and conditions, the claim of insurance money will be disallowed, said a bench headed by Justice U ULalit. It is a fundamental breach if the vehicle was driven/used without ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court stated that a financial creditor's power of attorney who has been given authorization can file an application on its behalf under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.BACKGROUND In the case, the Bank gra ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS The Supreme Court has held that the Irrigation Department of the State of Madhya Pradesh is not a "Industrial Establishment" under Section 25L of the Industrial Disputes Act, and that the test for determining whether or not a ..
Power Of Attorney Having Authorization Of Financial Creditor Can File Application U/S 7 IBCThe case was of Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth v. Chandra Prakash Jain. The decision was given by Justices L. Nageswara Rao, BR Gavai and BV Nagarathna. The Court ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case: Ramgopal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Coram: CJI NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant Case No: CrA 1489 of 2012KEY-TAKEAWAYS There is discretionary power of the court to dismiss non compoundable cases under Section 482 CrP ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM Case Name: P Lathavya Acharya And State Of Karnataka Case Citation: WP 8926/2021KEY TAKEAWAYS No violation of Fundamental rights by practicing Bala-sanyasa. The selection of Shiroor Mutt's Peedathipathi is in keeping wi ..
KEY TAKEAWAYS “Appointments to public posts should be strictly in accordance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India", the Court said. The eligibility standards must be uniform without giving any scope of arbitrary selections. ..
Provision For Upper Age Limit Is Mandatory & Can't Be RelaxedThe case was of the State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shaheena Masarat and Anr. The decision was given by Justices L Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna. The Court held that there could not ..
NAME OF THE CASE AND CORAM NAME: Khatema Fibres Ltd. vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. CORAM: Justices Hemant Gupta and V. Rama Subramanian CASE NO:CA 9050 OF 2018KEY TAKEAWAYS The Surveyors' Report is not totally sacrosanct. Consumer Forums, ..
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
