CASE PROCCEDINGS
- Under the newly amended IT Rules, the Bombay High Court on Friday gave interim orders.
- These interim orders were regarding the plea on the supplication testing, as an extensive conversation had resulted on Friday, when a news entry and a journalist sure-fired that the enhanced IT Rules are in opposition to the fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and are ultra vires to the Information Technology (IT) Act.
CASE BACKGROUNDS
- The candidates looked for a prompt stay on the execution of the IT Rules as "it had a chilling impact". Notwithstanding, the Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh contended that there is no desperation or need to remain the principles as there is no unfriendly activity started against the candidate.
- Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh stated that these rules were in the bigger public interest and there was a great deal of fake news now, which is needed to be dealt with. He referenced the inclusion of late Sushant Singh Rajput's demise and the sort of information that was spread about it.
RELEVANT SUBMISSIONS
- Senior Advocate Darius Khambata, showing up for one of the applicants, said that the short-sworn statement put together by the Center didn't call attention to a solitary arrangement.
- Darius Khambata said while closing his contentions that in a constitutional democracy, the option to not be right or incorrect, to talk unreservedly is significant. It was an attack on the popular government.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS CASE?
"Loved reading this piece by Tisya Mishra?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"